Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Efficiency of the Legal System Saritomo, Untung; Redi , Ahmad
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Vol. 6 No. 6 (2025): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jist.v6i6.9070

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become one of the most significant technological innovations in various sectors, including the legal system. With its ability to analyze big data and detect complex patterns, AI has the potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of law enforcement. This article will discuss the role of AI in improving the efficiency of the legal system as well as the challenges faced in its implementation. This article aims to explore how AI technology can be integrated into legal practice to speed up the decision-making process, reduce operational costs, and improve the accessibility of legal services. The writing of this article uses a qualitative approach, with data collection methods through desk study, the legal sources used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The results show that artificial intelligence has an important role to play in improving the efficiency of the legal system through big data analysis, automation of legal processes, and offense detection. However, despite its significant benefits, ethical and regulatory challenges related to the use of AI in the legal system also need to be addressed. Issues such as data privacy and algorithmic bias must be addressed so that the implementation of these technologies does not disadvantage certain parties. With the right strategy and collaboration between the government and the private sector, AI can be an innovative tool to improve the legal ecosystem in the future. Overall, artificial intelligence has great potential to revolutionize the legal system by improving operational efficiency and service accessibility. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term impact of integrating this technology in legal practice.
Juridical Analysis of Legal Protection On Charges Due To Discretionary Authority For Regional Officials Saritomo, Untung; Riswadi, Riswadi
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 3 No. 12 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v3i12.676

Abstract

This article reviews the roles and responsibilities of local officials in the use of discretionary powers and the legal repercussions that may arise from their decisions. Through a juridical approach, it investigates the legal protections available to local officials when they face indictments or lawsuits as a result of their discretionary actions. Taking into account the existing legal framework, this article analyzes various factors that may influence whether local officials will be held legally responsible for their discretionary decisions, including ethical, public policy and fairness considerations. In addition, it explores the legal safeguards that local officials can take, including enforceability of laws, liability insurance, and dispute resolution mechanisms. As such, this article aims to provide a better understanding of the complexities of legal protection for local officials in the context of the use of discretionary authority. The results showed that legal protection for regional officials related to the use of discretionary authority can be seen from various aspects, including the principle of legality, the principle of legal certainty and accountability. The juridical analysis of legal protection against charges due to discretionary authority for regional officials shows the importance of a deep understanding of the limits and responsibilities attached to the use of such authority. By paying attention to aspects of legality, legal certainty, and accountability, it is hoped that legal protection for regional officials can be guaranteed in the context of the use of discretionary authority.