Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Transformasi Digital Peradilan Solusi Fenomena “No Viral No Justice” Nabilla Syifa Auliya; Fadlah Nur; Siti Zahra
Proceeding of the International Conference on Global Education and Learning Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): June : Proceeding of the International Conference on Global Education and Learn
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/icgel.v2i1.138

Abstract

The hastag No. viral No. justice has recently emerged on social media platforms creating its own discourse in the justice system. This research aims to examine how the impact of this phenomenon on the judicial system and to find the ideal mechanism of digital transformation of justice so that this phenomenon remains in line with the principle of due process of law.This research method uses a social legal with a case study approach and conceptual approach in answering the problem formulation. This research found that this phenomenon is motivated by the slow response of law enforcement officials and the lack of transparency of the judicial system, then the impact of this phenomenon disrupts the independence of the judiciary because it is tried by the media and has the potential to accommodate the spread of hoaxes and public disinformation. To answer these challenges, the author proposes a digital transformation of the judiciary through the optimization of SIPP, by adding a verification link feature on the SIPP page. So that access to case tracking becomes more transparent. In addition, there are also new rules regarding the publication of unresolved legal cases on social media by requiring the admin and related accounts to provide a disclaimer and link to the SIPP verification link of the case. This regulation is regulated through the revision of the ITE Law by the legislators.
Menakar Ulang Kedudukan TAP MPR dalam Konstelasi Peraturan Perundang Undangan Pasca Amandemen Nur, Fadlah; Nabilla Syifa Auliya; Siti Zahra
Jurnal Restorasi Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Restorasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/mtj7m772

Abstract

The amendment of the Constitution does not only change the authority and position of the MPR in the constitutional system but also has an impact on its legal products. The placement of MPR Decree in the hierarchy of laws and regulations raises norm conflicts that lead to legal uncertainty, this research aims to examine how the ideal position of MPR Decree in the hierarchy of laws and regulations. This research uses normative juridical method with conceptual approach and statute approach. The results of the study found that there are several norm conflicts due to the inclusion of TAP MPR in the hierarchy, namely the issue of content material, the role of the consideration, the status of validity and constitutional testing which causes legal uncertaint. The author offers two alternative recommendation to the legislators. First, it is necessary to reassess to determine which provisions are still relevant to be maintained, so that a definite number is agreed upon. Then the content material is moved into the law. So that all MPR Decrees can still be used in the form of laws. Then revise the hierarchy of laws and regulations. Secondly, the lawmakers can just leave the MPR Decrees that are still recognised as MPR Decrees, with the legal status of laws and regulations. Whatever the lawmakers' choice, the MPR Decree must be removed from the hierarchy. Amandemen Undang Undang Dasar  tidak hanya mengubah wewenang dan kedudukan MPR dalam sistem ketatanegaraan namun juga berimbas pada produk hukum nya. Penempatan TAP MPR dalam hierarki peraturan perundang undangan menimbulkan konflik norma yang berujung pada ketidakpastian hukum, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana idealnya kedudukan TAP MPR dalam hirrarki  peraturan perundang undangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan  metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan kajian literatur . hasil penelitian menemukan terdapat beberapa konflik norma karena masuknya TAP MPR dalam hierarki yaitu masalah materi muatan, peran konsideran, status keberlakuan dan pengujian konstitusional yang menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum sehingga TAP MPR harus dikeluarkan dari hierarki melalui revisi UU no.12/2011