Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Contemporary Three-Kilogram LPG Gas Restriction Policy from a Fiqh Siyasah Perspective: Its Impact and Influence on the Welfare of Muslim Communities Audyna Putri Kaslam; Didik Revo Wiratama; Muhammad Roby Zen; Muhammad Fadly Roby; Amjad Hamad Abdullah
NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 01 (2025): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17350809

Abstract

This article examines the contemporary policy of restricting the distribution of three-kilogram LPG gas by the Indonesian government through the lens of Fiqh Siyasah. The policy has generated widespread public response due to its direct impact on poor and vulnerable groups, particularly Muslim communities who depend on subsidized LPG for their daily energy needs. Using a descriptive-analytical qualitative approach, this study explores how Fiqh Siyasah principles—such as public interest (maṣlaḥah), justice (‘adl), and the protection of fundamental rights (maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah)—serve as normative instruments for assessing the legitimacy and ethical foundation of public policy. The findings reveal that the restriction of three-kilogram LPG gas, when implemented without participatory mechanisms and social sensitivity, causes greater mafsadah (harm) to impoverished communities. However, the government’s responsive actions, such as reactivating local distributors, reflect the Islamic principles of leadership flexibility and adaptability. The academic contribution of this study lies in extending the application of Fiqh Siyasah to contemporary public policy, particularly in the management of economic resources and social protection. It offers a normative framework grounded in Sharia values for evaluating and formulating public policies that promote justice, welfare, and responsiveness to the needs of Muslim communities in the modern era.
Incorporating Islah Principles into Restorative Justice:  Bridging Contemporary Legal Practice and Islamic Values Joko Budi Darmawan; Fendy Suhariadi; Suparto Widjojo; Mia Amiati; Amjad Hamad Abdullah
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10435

Abstract

The concept of islah in Islamic law emphasizes peaceful conflict resolution through mediation, compromise, and forgiveness—principles that align closely with the restorative justice approach in modern legal systems. This article aims to explore the integration of islah values into the restorative justice framework, as well as how the concept of reconciliation in both positive law and Islamic law can be recontextualized in the contemporary era. This study employs a qualitative method using a normative-juridical and comparative approach based on a literature review of primary and secondary sources, including classical Islamic legal texts (turath), statutory regulations, and policy documents on restorative justice practices in Indonesia and selected Muslim-majority countries. The findings indicate that islah values hold significant potential to enrich restorative justice practices, particularly in strengthening participatory justice and the restoration of social relationships. The recontextualization of reconciliation not only opens space for dialogue between positive law and Islamic law but also offers a more humanistic, contextual, and community-responsive model of conflict resolution. The article recommends enhancing legal regulations to incorporate islah-based approaches within Indonesia's criminal justice system as part of a broader effort to harmonize national legal norms with Islamic values. Its academic contribution lies in providing a constructive foundation for the theoretical and normative integration of islah values into the national legal system through restorative justice while offering a new paradigm for resolving criminal cases in a more contextualized manner.