Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Rekonstruksi Pasca-Konflik di Gaza: Menuju Perdamaian Berkelanjutan melalui Pendekatan Foresight Ulum , Miftahul
INDEPENDEN: Jurnal Politik Indonesia dan Global Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): INDEPENDEN : Jurnal Politik Indonesia dan Global
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24853/independen.5.2.97-108

Abstract

Studi ini mengeksplorasi kompleksitas rekonstruksi pasca-konflik di Gaza melalui pendekatan foresight dan lensa konstruktivisme, dengan fokus pada tantangan utama Deklarasi Mesir 2025. Penelitian mengidentifikasi hambatan seperti kebuntuan politik antara Hamas dan Otoritas Palestina, penolakan Israel, ketidakpastian pendanaan, serta risiko politisasi oleh aktor eksternal. Meskipun lebih inklusif dibandingkan kesepakatan sebelumnya, Deklarasi Mesir belum mampu menyelesaikan akar masalah fragmentasi politik dan tata kelola keamanan. Analisis foresight mengungkap tiga skenario potensial: perdamaian berkelanjutan, konflik siklis, atau stabilitas parsial dengan pembangunan terbatas. Studi ini juga menyoroti peran strategis aktor non-negara seperti Muhammadiyah dalam mendukung rekonstruksi melalui bantuan kemanusiaan, pendidikan, pemberdayaan ekonomi, dan penguatan institusi. Kesimpulannya, rekonstruksi Gaza memerlukan pendekatan multidimensi yang menggabungkan tata kelola inklusif, kemandirian ekonomi, dan inovasi teknologi, dengan peran kritis aktor transnasional berbasis nilai dan pengetahuan seperti Muhammadiyah untuk menciptakan perdamaian yang berkelanjutan dan berkeadilan. Kata kunci: Rekonstruksi Gaza, Deklarasi Mesir 2025, Muhammadiyah, Foresight, Perdamaian Berkelanjutan.
Fikih Organisasi (Reaktualisasi Sejarah Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) di Indonesia) Ulum , Miftahul; Wahid , Abd
Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): September 2019
Publisher : LPPPM STAI Darul Hikmah Bangkalan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35309/alinsyiroh.v5i2.161

Abstract

Historical facts state that NU was an organization that was originally founded by religious scholars of pesantren, before the birth of NU in Surabaya in 1926. In 1961 as the golden age of the beginning of the nation's awakening (Nahdlatul Wathon) because at that time Indonesia was under colonialist rule, the pesantren religious scholars as the central figure in the struggle for independence of the Unitary Republic of Indonesia no longer prioritized the Islamic group which was limited, but rather a universal policy for the rise of the nation and in the context of the struggle to drive out colonialism. In its historical roots, as a center of freedom movement fighters, Nahdlatul Wathon was then followed by the establishment of Nahdlatut Tujjar (Resurrection of Traders) which was an attempt by the religious scholars to build and develop the economic independence of the community, rival and drive out the economic development of the colonizers. Nahdlatut Tujjar's struggle which later became a practical warrior in the economic sector, in addition to his struggle in the national sector through Nahdlatul Wathon. The NU Autonomous Agency is an NU Organizational Tool that functions to help implement NU policies, especially those relating to disadvantaged communities. The autonomous bodies referred to include: Fatayat NU, Muslimat NU, GP Ansor, IPNU, IPPNU, Jam'iyan Expert Thariqah al Mu'tabaroh an Nahdliyah, JQH (Jamiyatul Quro 'wal Hufadz), Pergunu (Nahdlatul Ulama Teachers' Association) , and ISNU (Nahdlatul Ulama Bachelor Association).
Comparative Study on Criminal Penalties According to The Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law and The Indonesian Criminal Law Code Ulum , Miftahul; Nasiri , Nasiri; Repo , Nora
Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): March 2023
Publisher : LPPPM STAI Darul Hikmah Bangkalan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35309/alinsyiroh.v9i1.231

Abstract

The issue of punishment in Islam is by raising one type of punishment that is often not brought to the surface, namely the fine (diyat) as an alternative type of punishment. Sentencing also costs a lot of money, for example in the costs of court proceedings, imprisonment, parole, consultation centers that must be attended, and collection of fines. The method used in this research is a normative juridical comparison between Islamic Law and the Criminal Code (KUHP). The research specification used is descriptive analysis. The data collected and processed to support this research used library research which was processed qualitatively. All of our data is separated by data that is relevant or irrelevant to this research. The results of the research and data analysis in this study state that: first, in Islamic Criminal Law there is no such thing as a complaint offense, all jarimahs, be it hudud, qishos, diyat, and takzir, are all ordinary offenses. Adultery in Islamic law is not a complaint offense, whereas in the Criminal Code Article 284 the crime of adultery is a complaint offense, and is included in the category of absolute complaint offense. Second, in proving adultery in Islamic criminal law, it is proven by four things: testimony, confession, qarinah (indication), and li'an. However, this is not the case with the Criminal Code, because the criminal act of adultery is included in the category of an absolute complaint offense, there must be a complaint beforehand so that the offense can be processed