Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Nong Chok Muslim Students’ Perspective on LGBTQ+ Rights Legalization Zidan, Muhammad Zainuddin; Zaini Tamim AR
Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia Vol 9 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Ibrahimy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35316/jpii.v9i2.653

Abstract

Thailand is the only Southeast Asian country that is highly progressive in advancing the legalization of same-sex marriage. This development has elicited responses from various segments of society, including Muslim students as part of the minority group. This study examines the perspectives of Muslim students in Bangkok on the increasingly prominent issue of same-sex marriage legalization in Thailand, focusing on their viewpoints, socio-religious aspects, and the influence on their attitudes. The research employs a descriptive quantitative method. Data were collected from 18 Muslim students at an Islamic-based public school in Bangkok using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire. The findings reveal that Islamic values serve as the primary foundation shaping the views and attitudes of Muslim students in rejecting the legalization of same-sex marriage. However, they also exhibit a tolerant attitude in their interactions with LGBTQ+ individuals or communities, reflecting a pluralistic stance as citizens of Bangkok. The implications of this study highlight the importance of Islamic education that integrates Islamic values with pluralism, enabling Muslim students to adapt to a diverse society. Additionally, it offers an academic contribution to the literature on the relationship between religion and pluralism in the context of religious minorities.
Nong Chok Muslim Students’ Perspective on LGBTQ+ Rights Legalization Zidan, Muhammad Zainuddin; Zaini Tamim AR
Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia Vol 9 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Ibrahimy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35316/jpii.v9i2.653

Abstract

Thailand is the only Southeast Asian country that is highly progressive in advancing the legalization of same-sex marriage. This development has elicited responses from various segments of society, including Muslim students as part of the minority group. This study examines the perspectives of Muslim students in Bangkok on the increasingly prominent issue of same-sex marriage legalization in Thailand, focusing on their viewpoints, socio-religious aspects, and the influence on their attitudes. The research employs a descriptive quantitative method. Data were collected from 18 Muslim students at an Islamic-based public school in Bangkok using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire. The findings reveal that Islamic values serve as the primary foundation shaping the views and attitudes of Muslim students in rejecting the legalization of same-sex marriage. However, they also exhibit a tolerant attitude in their interactions with LGBTQ+ individuals or communities, reflecting a pluralistic stance as citizens of Bangkok. The implications of this study highlight the importance of Islamic education that integrates Islamic values with pluralism, enabling Muslim students to adapt to a diverse society. Additionally, it offers an academic contribution to the literature on the relationship between religion and pluralism in the context of religious minorities.
Thailand Islamic Community Perspective Towards the Ratification of LGBTQI++ Zidan, Muhammad Zainuddin; Iskandarsyah, Muhammad Raditya
KARSA Journal of Social and Islamic Culture Vol. 32 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/karsa.v32i2.15630

Abstract

The Marriage Equality Bill in Thailand will officially take effect on January 22, 2025. With this enactment, Muslims in Thailand will certainly have perspectives and attitudes concerning the youth in Islam in facing this issue. This study aims to explore the views of Islamic religious teachers regarding students in light of the legalization of LGBTQI++ in Thailand. To gather this information, a questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale was distributed to 12 Islamic religious teachers at Sasana Business Administration Vocational College in Bangkok. The primary source of this study consists of data from the questionnaire, while secondary sources include relevant research articles that support this research article. The results indicate that almost all Islamic religious teachers are opposed to the enactment of this policy. They believe it will impact students' identity, characteristics, and religious morality as the young Muslim generation in Thailand. Therefore, they propose plans to provide education on these issues through communication strategies and open discussions.
Sistem Perekrutan Marketplace Guru terhadap Nasib Guru Honorer di Indonesia Zidan, Muhammad Zainuddin
JOIES (Journal of Islamic Education Studies) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): June
Publisher : Program Studi Doktor Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Program Magister Pendidikan Agama Islam, Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/joies.2024.9.1.41-52

Abstract

This article discusses the teacher recruitment system in the Teacher Marketplace, with a focus on the fate of contract teachers, which was a policy introduced by Nadiem Anwar Makarim during his tenure as the Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. The system is expected to address the issues faced by contract teachers, particularly in terms of their well-being. The research method employed is qualitative, involving a literature review using primary sources from journals related to the Teacher Marketplace and secondary sources from online news reports. Although the Teacher Marketplace system is expected to expedite real-time teacher recruitment, the large number of teachers in Indonesia still leads to an imbalance in the required positions. This argument aligns with the findings of the research conducted by Hidayat and Asriyantini (2020) and contradicts those of Rosmi (2019).