Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora Policy and Law Journal SINAR: Sinergi Pengabdian dan Inovasi untuk Masyarakat
Herdy Pratama Susantyo
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Anak Pasca Perceraian Orang Tua Herdy Pratama Susantyo; Wahibatul Maghfuroh
Policy and Law Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Laskar Karya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Islam places harmony within the family as a fundamental aspect, viewing marriage as a sacred bond aimed at creating a prosperous family. However, divorce remains an unavoidable social reality, although in Islam, it is only permitted as a last resort. One of the most significant impacts of divorce is on children, who may experience emotional and psychological instability, as well as challenges in their social and academic lives. Therefore, it is the responsibility of parents to minimise the negative effects of divorce on their children. From a legal perspective, divorce affects the rights and obligations of parents, particularly regarding custody and child support. In the Indonesian legal system, various regulations such as Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, the Child Protection Law, and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) have regulated the protection of children after divorce based on the principle of the best interests of the child. However, the implementation of these provisions still faces several challenges, such as non-compliance with maintenance obligations and prolonged disputes over custody rights. This study employs a normative legal method to analyse the effectiveness of post-divorce child protection regulations and the various challenges in their implementation. It is hoped that the findings of this study will provide more effective policy recommendations to ensure the well-being of children after their parents' divorce.
PKM Penanaman Kesadaran Hukum Sejak Dini Dalam Aspek Ruang Lingkup Keluarga Di Desa Sambirampak Kidul Herdy Pratama Susantyo; Abdul Rofid Juniardi; Achmad Zahid Zhafif Albariq
SINAR: Sinergi Pengabdian dan Inovasi untuk Masyarakat Vol 2 No 01 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : CV. Laskar Karya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65678/sinar.v2i01.265

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas upaya peningkatan pemahaman dan kesadaran hukum masyarakat Desa Sambirampak Kidul, Kabupaten Probolinggo, terkait Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT). Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengembangkan strategi edukasi hukum yang aplikatif, partisipatif, dan berkelanjutan melalui pemberdayaan tokoh masyarakat, perangkat desa, dan simulasi praktik hukum. Metode yang digunakan adalah pengabdian kepada masyarakat (PKM) dengan desain partisipatif dan edukatif, mencakup ceramah, dialog interaktif, dan role play. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, dokumentasi, serta pre-test dan post-test untuk mengukur peningkatan pemahaman hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan dalam pemahaman bentuk KDRT (fisik, psikis, seksual, ekonomi) dan hak-hak korban. Partisipasi aktif tokoh lokal sebagai agen edukasi hukum dan integrasi materi hukum dalam kegiatan posyandu serta keagamaan memperkuat keberlanjutan literasi hukum di desa. Pendekatan ini mendorong keberanian korban untuk melapor, memperkuat dukungan komunitas, dan menumbuhkan budaya hukum yang adil. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pengembangan model penyuluhan berbasis digital dan integrasi kearifan lokal untuk memperluas jangkauan edukasi hukum dan meningkatkan responsivitas masyarakat terhadap isu KDRT.
Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah terhadap Hak Milik Perorangan menurut Peraturan Menteri ATR/BPN No 21 Tahun 2020 tentang Penanganan dan Penyelesaian Kasus Pertanahan Yusril Ihza Mahendra; Herdy Pratama Susantyo
AHKAM Vol 4 No 3 (2025): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v4i3.7110

Abstract

This study is motivated by the limited research on mechanisms for resolving land disputes over individual ownership rights, despite the significant impact of such issues on legal certainty and social stability in Indonesia. The objective is to analyze the implementation of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency (Permen ATR/BPN) No. 21 of 2020 in resolving land disputes and providing legal protection for individual landowners. The research employed a normative juridical method, using data sources comprising legal documents, statutory regulations, and case studies selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through literature review and document analysis, then examined descriptively and qualitatively using a statutory approach. The findings show that the regulation provides three primary dispute resolution mechanisms, mediation, conciliation, and litigation with priority given to amicable settlements before resorting to court proceedings. These mechanisms enhance efficiency, reduce conflict escalation, and safeguard individual property rights in line with the principle of legal certainty. The study concludes that the application of Permen ATR/BPN No. 21 of 2020 plays an important role in streamlining administrative procedures and strengthening the legal protection of landowners. Its implications include theoretical contributions to land law literature and practical recommendations for policymakers, land authorities, and legal practitioners to clarify procedures, strengthen mediation capacity, and raise public awareness, while also opening opportunities for further research on the long-term effectiveness of non-litigation dispute resolution.
Analisis Yuridis Pendekatan Restoratif Berbasis Kearifan Lokal pada Tindak Pidana Ringan Herdy Pratama Susantyo; Ahmad Saifuddin; Ahmad Ferdi Hasan
AHKAM Vol 4 No 3 (2025): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v4i3.7283

Abstract

The limited number of studies on the integration of local wisdom into the application of restorative justice for minor criminal offenses forms the background of this research, despite the significant potential of such an approach to strengthen social legitimacy and reduce the burden on the formal criminal justice system. This study aims, through a normative juridical perspective, to: (1) analyze the normative support and legal boundaries within existing positive law instruments; (2) formulate juridical parameters that allow local wisdom to be considered a legitimate element in restorative justice mechanisms; and (3) propose policy recommendations to strengthen the normative framework. The method employed is normative juridical analysis using the statute approach and conceptual approach. Primary legal sources include Prosecutorial Regulation No. 15 of 2020, National Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021, and the new Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023), while secondary and tertiary legal materials were obtained through legal literature and official legal databases. Data were analyzed using content analysis and legal interpretation through grammatical, systematic, and teleological methods. The findings indicate that while Prosecutorial Regulation No. 15 of 2020 has opened space for case dismissal based on restorative justice, it does not explicitly accommodate local wisdom values, potentially creating disharmony with the principle of legality and provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code. Moreover, regulatory inconsistencies at the village law level and ambiguities in classical literature regarding the scope of restorative justice were identified. The main conclusion of this study is the urgent need to draft or revise technical guidelines that explicitly regulate the integration of local wisdom as a valid juridical consideration within restorative justice mechanisms. The implications of this study are both theoretical enriching the literature on legal culture and restorative justice, and practical in enhancing the effectiveness of legally sound and socially accepted resolutions of minor offenses. This research also opens avenues for future studies with empirical and implementation-based approaches across different regions.
Analisis Yuridis Pengawasan Partisipatif Masyarakat sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum Muhammad Erfandi; Herdy Pratama Susantyo
AHKAM Vol 4 No 4 (2025): DESEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v4i4.7662

Abstract

Upholding integrity in the administration of general elections (Pemilu) is a crucial aspect of safeguarding the quality of democracy in Indonesia. One strategic approach to preventing electoral violations is participatory supervision, which involves the active engagement of the public. This study aims to analyze, from a juridical perspective, the forms, mechanisms, and effectiveness of participatory supervision within the Indonesian legal framework as an instrument for preventing election violations. A normative juridical method was employed by examining key regulations, such as Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections, alongside various technical provisions issued by the Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu). The findings indicate that participatory supervision plays a vital role in ensuring elections are conducted fairly, honestly, transparently, and cleanly, by encouraging voters to engage intelligently through data collection, violation reporting, and information dissemination. Nevertheless, its effectiveness in practice faces several challenges, including limited public understanding, insufficient outreach by election organizers, and institutional capacity constraints. The study concludes that participatory supervision is a strategic tool for preventing electoral violations, yet it requires regulatory strengthening, continuous political education, and synergy between Bawaslu, stakeholders, and civil society to be effectively and sustainably implemented.
Co-Authors Abdul Rofid Juniardi Achmad Zahid Zhafif Albariq Ahmad Ferdi Hasan Ahmad Saifuddin Muhammad Erfandi Wahibatul Maghfuroh Yusril Ihza Mahendra