Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Puteri Hijau : Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah Rechtsvinding
Munthe, Gerald Elisa
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Open Legal Policy Regarding the Age Limit of Notary Public Based on Constitutional Court Decision Number. 84/PUU-XXII/2024 Munthe, Gerald Elisa
Rechtsvinding Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.v3i1.790

Abstract

Open legal policy emerged when the 1945 Constitution gave an order to regulate a norm through a law, in this case the Legal Regulation of Article 8 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 2 of 2014 as an amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary. The research method used is normative juridical or library research, by analyzing library materials or secondary data relevant to the topic. This research is descriptive analytical, namely the data obtained and processed and analyzed to provide a comprehensive picture of the open legal policy in the norming of Article 8 paragraph (2) which regulates the age limit of the notary office as stated in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary. Research Results Show that the determination of the age limit for notaries is part of an open legal policy that is within the authority of the legislators, as long as it does not conflict with the principles guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution. However, this policy can be considered invalid if it violates constitutional principles, such as the principle of non-discrimination, equality before the law, and the feasibility and rationality of public policy.
Notary Position After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012: Certainty and Legal Protection of Notary Rights (Verschoningsrecht) in Carrying Out Duties Based on Law Number 30 of 2004 Munthe, Gerald Elisa
JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 9, No 3 (2024): Agustus, Education, Social Issue and History Education.
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jimps.v9i3.31905

Abstract

A notary is a public official who is given authority by the State in making authentic deeds. In making the authentic deed, it must be in accordance with the standards regulated by the Law on the Notary Position, if the Notary is summoned/requested by the Investigator to testify/provide information about the authentic deed made by/before the Notary, then it is the legal obligation of the Notary to fulfill this. The problem discussed in this article is that after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 49/PUU-X/2012 has not fully provided certainty and legal protection for Notaries who exercise the right of default when asked for information or sanctions in the investigation or requested by a judge in court. The research method used is normative juridical with an analytical descriptive approach and laws and regulations. The results of the study show that the legal protection of the MKN is carried out in a repressive manner related to Article 66 Paragraph (1) with the aim of avoiding arbitrary actions by investigators and has not fully provided a guarantee of legal protection for the right to deny the rights of notary officials who are summoned based on the infiltration of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 49/PUU-X/2012.
ANALISIS FORMULASI HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP KORBAN KEKERASAN SEKSUAL: STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MEDAN NOMOR 1170/PID.SUS/2018/PN.MDN Munthe, Gerald Elisa
Puteri Hijau : Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Puteri Hijau: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah
Publisher : Department of History Education, Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/ph.v9i2.62600

Abstract

Kekerasan seksual merupakan tindak pidana yang sering terjadi pada perempuan dan sudah menjadi permasalahan global. Banyaknya kekerasan terhadap perempuan ini telah mendorong negara untuk mensahkan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Terjadinya kekerasan seksual dapat mengakibatkan korban mengalami penderitaan fisik, mental, seksual, ekonomi serta sosial yang berkepanjangan. Permasalahan yang dibahas pada tulisan ini bagaimana formulasi hukum pidana memberikan jaminan yang konprenship terhadap penanggulangan kekerasan seksual terhadap perempuan baik secara penal maupun secara non penal. Metode penelitian yang digunaka adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekakan  deskriptif analitis menggunakan data skunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer dan skunder berupa peraturan perundangan-undangan. Hasil Penelitian menunjukan bahwa formulasi hukum yang mengatur tentang tindak pidana kekerasan seksual sudah diatur melakui Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP); Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga; Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual ; Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Tindak Pidana Perdangangan Orang, yang kemudian kebijakan terhadap putusan yang diberikan oleh hakim terhadap terdakwa sudah memenuhi rasa keadilan terhadap terdakwa dan korban  karena setelah mempertimbangkan alasan-alasan dan fakta-fakta hukum yang ditemukan  dipersidangan dan tetap kepada keyakinan hakim dalam membuat keputusan dan demi keadilan berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa.
Co-Authors