Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.084
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Referendum Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Songga Aurora Abadi
Unknown Affiliation
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Referendum

 1 
Kajian Hukum Tata Negara terhadap Penyimpangan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Nomor 112/PUU-XXI/2023 Gunawan Widjaja; Songga Aurora Abadi; Sukh Pawen Jit Kaur
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i3.967

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022, which changed the term of office for the leadership of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) from four years to five years, has sparked controversy in the realm of Indonesian constitutional law. The Constitutional Court, which is supposed to act as a negative legislator, is considered to have exceeded the limits of its authority by establishing new norms in its decision. This research aims to analyze whether the action is a form of deviation of the Constitutional Court's authority referring to the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court. This research uses a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach through a literature study of regulations, scientific journals, and other legal sources. The research findings indicate that the Constitutional Court not only declared Article 34 paragraph (1) of the KPK Law contrary to the 1945 Constitution, but also stipulated a direct change in the term of office to five years, including for the current KPK leadership. This action is considered a form of judicial activism that deviates from the principle of separation of powers and the principle of non-retroactivity of law. In conclusion, the Constitutional Court's decision creates legal uncertainty, opens space for politicization of the judiciary, and sets a negative precedent in Indonesia's constitutional system. Therefore, it is necessary to reaffirm the limits of the authority of the Constitutional Court in order to remain within the framework of constitutional law that upholds the principle of checks and balances at all times.
Tanggung Jawab Perdata Influencer terhadap Klaim Produk dalam Endorsement: Tinjauan Hukum Atas Perlindungan Konsumen Berdasarkan UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 dan Perkembangan Praktik Digital di Indonesia Gunawan Widjaja; Songga Aurora Abadi; Yuri Anggi
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i2.913

Abstract

The advancement of digital technology has introduced a novel trend in marketing via social media platforms, specifically through influencers promoting products or services. Nonetheless, numerous endorsements by influencers contain misleading, inaccurate, or harmful claims to consumers. This research aims to analyze the civil liability of influencers for product claims that cause consumer harm in digital media endorsements, referencing Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. Utilizing a normative juridical method based on literature review of laws, legal doctrines, and pertinent cases, the findings reveal that influencers can be held civilly liable under the tort principle (onrechtmatige daad) as stipulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code, if proven to provide false or unsupported claims resulting in consumer harm (Setiawan, 2019). Therefore, there is a pressing need to enhance regulations governing the role of influencers in consumer protection frameworks alongside effective liability mechanisms as a form of accountability in the evolving digital marketing landscape.
Co-Authors Alam Anbari Gunawan Widjaja Mervyn Mervyn Novi Rizky Ramadhani Robert Iskandar Sukh Pawen Jit Kaur Yuri Anggi