Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ILMU USHULUDDIN REVELATIA: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur`an dan Tafsir
Ansari, Miftach
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
THE CONTIGUITY OF MUSA’S SHARIA IN THE QURAN: TORAH AND ṢUḤUF TERMINOLOGY IN EXEGETICAL LITERATURES Saputra, Ali Thaufan Dwi; Ansari, Miftach
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol. 10, No. 1, July 2023
Publisher : Peminat Ilmu Ushuluddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v10i1.32429

Abstract

This article attempts to trace the contiguity of the substance of the sharia revealed to Musa in the Quran by tracing the terminology of the Torah and Ṣuḥuf on exegetical sources. The article will track the intersection of the classical and contemporary exegetical sources that use the jurisprudence approach as a lens in interpreting the Quran. This research is qualitative in nature, and the method used is descriptive-analytical. As a result, at least based on exegetical literature, there is a specific intersection between the sharia brought by Musa and the sharia brought by Muhammad in the Quran. The intersection lies, for example, in legal aspects such as qiṣāṣ, diyāt and rajam. However, there are different views on addressing this contiguity. One view is that the contiguity does not mean anything because the previous sharia has been abolished by the revelation of the Quran. Another view states that the Quran is a conclusive-confirmative revelation and does not abolish previous sharia.
Rationalizing Divine Scripture: Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy’s Interpretation of Quranic Narratives on Prophetic Miracles and Earlier Communities Amaliea Rizqi; Dwi Saputra, Ali Thaufan; Ansari, Miftach
REVELATIA Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur`an dan Tafsir Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : IAIN Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/revelatia.v6i1.18601

Abstract

This study explores the rational approach in Qur’anic interpretation by Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy, as found in his work Tafsir Al-Qur’anul Majid an-Nur, particularly in relation to verses about prophetic miracles and stories of past nations. Traditionally, Qur’anic commentators have interpreted such verses by relying on classical reports, including Hadith and Israiliyat narratives. However, Hasbi offers an alternative, more rational and contextual approach. This research employs a qualitative method with a textual analysis of Hasbi’s tafsir. The study focuses on his interpretation of the miracles of Prophet Jesus (Ali ‘Imran: 49), the affliction of Prophet Ayyub (al-Anbiya’: 83 and Sad: 41), Prophet Abraham and the birds (Ali ‘Imran: 260), Prophet Sulaiman’s (Solomon) ability to understand the language of animals (al-Naml: 16–20), and the story of Uzair (al-Baqarah: 259). The findings reveal that Hasbi attempts to rationalize these verses through engagement with modern scientific perspectives, including references to medical science and interpretative deviations from literal meanings. Nevertheless, he also incorporates traditional narratives, including Israiliyyat, as supplementary material. The study concludes that Hasbi developed a model of interpretation that integrates rational reasoning with classical exegetical traditions, making his approach particularly relevant in contemporary academic discourse.
THE CONTIGUITY OF MUSA’S SHARIA IN THE QURAN: TORAH AND ṢUḤUF TERMINOLOGY IN EXEGETICAL LITERATURES Saputra, Ali Thaufan Dwi; Ansari, Miftach
ILMU USHULUDDIN Vol 10, No 1, July 2023
Publisher : Peminat Ilmu Ushuluddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/iu.v10i1.32429

Abstract

This article attempts to trace the contiguity of the substance of the sharia revealed to Musa in the Quran by tracing the terminology of the Torah and Ṣuḥuf on exegetical sources. The article will track the intersection of the classical and contemporary exegetical sources that use the jurisprudence approach as a lens in interpreting the Quran. This research is qualitative in nature, and the method used is descriptive-analytical. As a result, at least based on exegetical literature, there is a specific intersection between the sharia brought by Musa and the sharia brought by Muhammad in the Quran. The intersection lies, for example, in legal aspects such as qiṣāṣ, diyāt and rajam. However, there are different views on addressing this contiguity. One view is that the contiguity does not mean anything because the previous sharia has been abolished by the revelation of the Quran. Another view states that the Quran is a conclusive-confirmative revelation and does not abolish previous sharia.
Co-Authors Ali Thaufan Dwi Saputra Amaliea Rizqi