Hendri, Aisyah Febria
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Pelanggaran Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Kasus Penganiayaan Mario Dandy Terhadap David Ozora Dewi, Tiwi Ayu Haresa; Aliffia, Nayla; Hendri, Aisyah Febria; Putri, Dwi Cinta Wiliananda; Az-Zikra, Za’im Sya’ban Syauqi; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Human rights are basic rights that every person is born with and cannot be revoked by anyone.  The case of Mario Dandy's severe persecution of David Ozora is a clear example of a violation of the right to life, the right to security, and the right to protection from violence guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 39/1999 on Human Rights.  To investigate the types of human rights violations that occurred and how the perspective of human rights law assesses these violations, this research uses a normative methodology, namely a literature study.  The results show that these acts not only violate national law but also violate international human rights.  The court's verdict against the perpetrators shows the importance of fair law enforcement and the equality of every citizen before the law.
Analisis terhadap Unsur-Unsur Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 79/Pdt.G/2023/PN Jkt.Sel Tahun 2023 Hendri, Aisyah Febria; Tazkia, Rahma; Zinan, Zalfa; S, Sulastri
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17825392

Abstract

This research analyzes the elements of illegal acts (PMH) in the South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 79/Pdt.G/2023/PN Jkt.Sel Year 2023. The method used is juridical normative through the examination of the decision as a primary source, as well as the analysis of Article 1365 of the Civil Code, the ITE Law, and the Telecommunication Law as a normative framework. The research results show that the panel of judges stated that the lawsuit was unacceptable because it was considered premature, so that the elements of PMH could not be tested substantially. This decision emphasizes the importance of the relationship between the criminal proof process and civil proof in PMH cases related to alleged telecommunication violations.