Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Jurnal Riset Rumpun Agama dan Filsafat
Ahmad Fudhaili
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Credibility of Shaykh Nawawi al-Bantani in Ḥadīth Studies: A Study of his Sanad and Ḥadīth Books Zulfarizal; Kharis, Muhammad Abdul; Ahmad Fudhaili
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v9i1.10126

Abstract

Sheikh Nawawi al-Bantani is a great Ulama (Muslim scholar) from the archipelago who managed to go worldwide because of his knowledge. As an Ulama, he dedicated his life to the odyssey of learning and taught it to others. Almost all fields of religious knowledge were mastered by him, including the science of ḥādīth. Although he is well-known as a mufassir, his expertise in the field of ḥādīth is very visible when viewed in detail in his works, especially in the books of Tanqih al-Qawl and Nashaih al-'Ibad. In this study, the writer tries to describe and analyse his credibility in the field of ḥādīth through those two books and his other works. Through qualitative steps accompanied by a historical approach involving documents written by Sheikh Nawawi and other archives, this research has managed to see the special attention given by the Ulama who took part in the Middle East in the field of ḥādīth. The first evidence is the number of ḥādīth narrations that he included in the books he wrote. Second, he studied a lot of dirāyah ḥādīth books, as can be seen in the book al-'Iqd al-Farīd min Jawāhir al-Asānīd by Sheikh Yāsīn al-Fādānī. Third, he had books containing the narration of ḥādīth, namely Tanqih al-Qawl and Nashaih al-'Ibad.  
Analisis Tematik Terminologi Kepemimpinan dalam Hadis: Kajian Berbasis Metodologi Yūsuf al-Qarḍāwī M. Maulana Fahmi; Ahmad Fudhaili
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Agustus : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Agama dan Filsafat
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrafi.v4i2.4869

Abstract

A leader is a highly important position that carries significant responsibility. In the books of Hadith, there are many terms that mean leader, such as Imām, Emīr, Khalīfah, Ḥakīm, Sulṭān, Mālik, Sayyid, Jabbār, Rāʿin, Qayṣar, Kisrā, and Aʿājim. The aim of this research is to understand leadership from the perspective of the Prophet’s hadiths. The study of leadership from the hadith perspective shows that there are various terms for leadership, and each term can also have multiple meanings. The approach used in this paper is the contemporary hadith approach of Yūsuf al-Qarḍāwī. This research employs a quantitative method based on library research, such as literature, books, journals, or other scientific works. The primary sources used are hadiths on leadership found in major hadith collections and the book Kayfa Nataʿāmal Maʿa al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah. Secondary sources include literature, books, journals, and other scientific works that discuss leadership. This research is linear in nature because it uses only one approach from a single field of study. It also briefly covers the meanings of leadership terms from dictionaries and various scholars.
Authority, Intellectual Networks and Politics in the Canonization of Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān Adnan Muzaki, Kiki; Ahmad Fudhaili; Habil Abyad; Faisal Mahmoud Adam
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Department of Qur'an dan Hadith Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2025.15.2.27-59

Abstract

This study examines the canonization process of Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān, considering that both possess similar critical authority and methodology yet hold differing reputations. Employing a qualitative method with a historical-comparative approach, the study draws upon classical sources on tarājim al-ruwwāt, historiography, and al-jarḥ wa al-ta‘dīl, as well as relevant contemporary academic scholarship. The findings demonstrate that al-Bukhārī’s methodological superiority provided a strong foundation for the widespread acceptance of his work. However, the canonical status of Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī did not emerge solely from methodological precision and personal authority, but also from layered social processes, including traditions of scholarly criticism and defense, networks of knowledge transmission, and political as well as institutional support. By contrast, Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān who has comparable methodical and personal authority   did not undergo the same social and historical trajectory, so that it does have the same reputation as al-Bukhari. This study fills an analytical gap in ḥadīth studies by demonstrating that the divergent historical trajectories of these two collections were not rooted in methodological disparities only, but also in distinct socio-historical contexts, scholarly networks, and political patronage. 
Co-Authors Adnan Muzaki, Kiki Faisal Mahmoud Adam Habil Abyad Kharis, Muhammad Abdul M. Maulana Fahmi Zulfarizal