Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Law and Society Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia
Kiriushyn, Dmytro
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Factors and Proposals for Improving the Efficiency of the Enforcement of Judicial Decisions in Ukraine Zhukevych, Ihor; Dzikovskyi, Maksym; Kiriushyn, Dmytro; Koziar, Roman; Korniienko, Petro
International Journal of Law and Society Vol 4 No 1 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS)
Publisher : NAJAHA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59683/ijls.v4i1.157

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the primary factors limiting the efficiency of judicial decision enforcement in Ukraine, identify the key determinants, and propose measures to enhance this process. The methodological foundation of the research used an analysis of regulatory legal acts and scientific literature. Academic sources were selected following the PRISMA method, which made it possible to attract the most relevant scientific literature (47 publications). The findings highlight that the failure to enforce judicial decisions in Ukraine is a multifaceted issue requiring further resolution. Specific challenges include economic constraints, inconsistencies in accessing data from various databases and registers, corruption-related matters, and the disproportion between state and private executors. Proposals for improvement include updating government programmes for the compensation of judicial debts and amending regulations on the sale of state property by lifting moratoriums on such sales. It is also proposed to increase the state’s share to 75% and restructure existing debts. Another potential measure involves increasing the number of private executors, granting them broader powers, and improving their access to state information. The methodology explicitly prioritised studies published in English to facilitate additional critique and analysis within the multinational research community, which tends to engage more actively with English-language publications. The conclusions emphasise that the current situation regarding the non-enforcement of judicial decisions requires further comprehensive reforms, particularly in the existing legislative framework. A promising area for further research is the analysis of foreign practices that can be applied to Ukrainian realities.
Unity and Contradictions Between Law and Morality in British and Ukrainian Proceedings Bychkov, Ihor; Ponomarenko, Yuriy A.; Epel, Oksana V.; Belkin, Mark; Kiriushyn, Dmytro
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): (January-June 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v8i1.25486

Abstract

Law and morality are closely interconnected in the regulation of social relations, shaping both legal awareness and social behaviour. In different legal systems, this relationship is manifested through legislation, case law and ethical standards that influence legal decision-making. This study examines how moral principles interact with legal norms in UK and Ukrainian litigation, using a comprehensive methodological approach that includes dialectical, comparative, historical and formal legal analysis. The study highlights how moral and legal dilemmas in judicial decisions affect public trust and perceptions of justice, particularly in cases involving corruption, political influence and human rights. By identifying these problems, the study suggests legal interventions, such as the introduction of amicus curiae mechanisms, strengthening judicial ethics and moral reasoning in judicial decisions, which can better align judicial processes with the values and expectations of the community. This article contributes to the field of legal community engagement by suggesting practical strategies for bridging the gap between formal legal systems and the lived experience of communities. It is particularly relevant to practitioners, policy makers and judicial educators who seek to promote socially responsible justice systems that empower marginalised groups and foster public trust in the rule of law.
Co-Authors Belkin, Mark Bychkov, Ihor Dzikovskyi, Maksym Epel, Oksana V. Korniienko, Petro Koziar, Roman Ponomarenko, Yuriy A. Zhukevych, Ihor