Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Postoperative External Beam Radiotherapy and Radioactive Iodine versus Radioactive Iodine Alone In Differentiated Thyroid Cancer-Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Maren Irgiwi Fadlilah; Nova Agusta Isdiarto; Arundito Widikusumo
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/ahd9ss16

Abstract

Introduction: Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy, with an increasing incidence globally. Radioactive iodine therapy (RAI) is the standard adjuvant treatment after thyroidectomy, but the role of postoperative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) remains controversial, with conflicting evidence regarding its efficacy in improving local-regional control and overall survival. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining EBRT with RAI compared with RAI alone in improving local-regional control and disease-free survival in adult patients with DTC. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed based on PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, focusing on studies published after 2005. Inclusion criteria included patients with DTC who received EBRT and RAI versus RAI alone. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4 with a random effects model to calculate effect sizes and assess heterogeneity. Results: Of the 12,000 articles identified, three studies with a total of 606 participants met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that EBRT had no significant impact on overall survival or distant metastasis rate (RR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.14–2.54; p = 0.48; I² = 92%), but has potential benefit in local-regional control, especially in high-risk patients with unresectable tumors or poor RAI uptake. Discussion: The role of EBRT in the management of DTC remains controversial due to the retrospective nature of most studies and variations in treatment protocols. Although it may improve local-regional control, its impact on survival is inconclusive. The potential for increased morbidity and the lack of prospective trials highlight the need for further research to identify subgroups of patients who may benefit most from EBRT. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that EBRT does not provide significant clinical implications compared with RAI alone. Further studies with standard treatment regimens are needed to clarify the role of EBRT in DTC management.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PATHOLOGIST-CONFIRMED LUNG CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY (DTA) META-ANALYSIS Maren Irgiwi Fadlilah; Wijaya Hadi Suryanto
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/rh9enw31

Abstract

Objectives Lung cancer continues to be the primary cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with early detection essential for enhancing survival rates. Notwithstanding progress in imaging and pathology, existing diagnostic techniques encounter constraints including elevated false-positive rates, inter-observer variability, and difficulties in detecting smaller, early-stage nodules such as ground-glass nodules (GGNs). Artificial Intelligence (AI) provides prospective answers by improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of AI algorithms in diagnosing pathologist-confirmed lung cancer, emphasizing their diagnostic accuracy and potential to transform clinical practice. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. A thorough literature search was conducted utilizing the Cochrane Library and PubMed until May 7, 2025, employing keywords pertinent to lung neoplasms and artificial intelligence. The inclusion criteria targeted research utilizing AI for the diagnosis of lung cancer, emphasizing diagnostic accuracy as the principal outcome. Data were extracted and evaluated for quality, and a meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4, utilizing random-effects models to address clinical heterogeneity. Results The meta-analysis comprised six investigations with an aggregate sample size of 486 participants. AI methods, including Support Vector Machines, Random Forests, Artificial Neural Networks, and Computer-aided Diagnosis systems, had an overall sensitivity of 79.0% and specificity of 80,2%. The positive predictive value was 68.9%, while the negative predictive value was 87,3%, signifying a high reliability of negative test outcomes. AI algorithms have considerable expertise in diagnosing lung cancer, with the potential to augment early detection and increase patient outcomes. Standardizing AI models and integrating unpublished data may augment the robustness of forthcoming analyses. Conclusion AI possesses significant potential to enhance lung cancer diagnosis, providing advantages for both patients and healthcare professionals. Notwithstanding current obstacles, continuous research and development, coupled with meticulous application in clinical settings, may result in substantial progress in the early identification and therapy of cancer.