Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Debate on Patriarchal Interpretation of Misogynist Hadith Chaniago, Salsabila Najma
Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i2.27

Abstract

Criticism of hadith as a source of law in Islam is still debated today. For some reason, the hadith has been overlooked as an infallible source, and its authenticity is often the subject of debate among past and present scholars. One of the important debates in hadith studies is the existence of misogynist traditions which are claimed to exist in the ṣaḥīḥ hadith collection. This article aims to find out how this hadith has been criticized because it is influenced by patriarchal interpretation and anti-women prejudice as claimed by feminists. This is caused by male dominance in various key aspects of Islamic texts, including the processes of transmission, preservation, publication and interpretation. Unfortunately, the interpretation of hadith, especially those relating to women, contains gender bias and discrimination against women. Feminists argue that these hadiths are interpreted in the interests of men and patriarchal culture. Apart from that, this research also tries to examine several reasons for rejecting patriarchal interpretations initiated by feminists, with the aim of rejecting anti-women discourse and emphasizing women-friendly interpretations of Islamic texts. These findings indicate that patriarchal interpretation may be the reason for the persecution of women, but the hadith contains equal divine wisdom for both sexes. It is a shared responsibility to provide a better understanding of hadith textually and contextually.
Kesehatan Mental Generasi Z dalam Era Digital: Studi Psikologis tentang Kecemasan Sosial dan Ketergantungan Media Sosial Chaniago, Salsabila Najma
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i1.35

Abstract

The development of digital technology has had a significant impact on the behavior and mental health of Generation Z, particularly in the context of intensive social media use. Generation Z is known as a generation born and raised in the digital era, so their social interactions are heavily influenced by the virtual world. The phenomenon of increasing social anxiety and dependence on social media has become an increasingly complex and relevant psychological issue for research. This study aims to analyze the relationship between social anxiety and social media dependence in Generation Z from a modern psychological perspective. This study uses a qualitative approach based on library research by examining theories of developmental psychology, social psychology, and empirical data from various relevant scientific journal articles. The results show that excessive social media use is positively correlated with increased symptoms of social anxiety such as fear of judgment from others, avoidance of social situations, and discomfort in face-to-face interactions. Dependence on social validation in the form of "likes" and comments also reinforces the cycle of anxiety, forming passive-aggressive interaction patterns and social comparisons that negatively impact self-esteem. Furthermore, social media algorithms that trigger repeated content consumption reinforce emotional dependence, causing users to feel trapped by unrealistic social expectations. In conclusion, social anxiety and social media dependence in Generation Z reinforce each other and form a cycle that has a serious impact on mental health, so a multidisciplinary approach is needed to address this problem comprehensively.