Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Al Fuadiy: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Ninda Dwi Anggraeni
Institut Ahmad Dahlan Probolinggo
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS FAKTOR–FAKTOR PERCERAIAN TAHUN 2024 DI PENGADILAN AGAMA PROBOLINGO: Perspektif Pengadilan Agama Probolinggo Ninda Dwi Anggraeni; M. Tosen; Nur Fadilah Dwi Winarni; Fauziyah Putri Meilinda
Al Fuadiy Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): June, Al Fuadiy : Journal of Islamic Family Law
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/af.v7i01.1245

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis faktor-faktor utama yang menyebabkan perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Probolinggo pada tahun 2024 menggunakan metode kualitatif Deskriptif, dengan menekankan pentingnya perkawinan sebagai suatu ikatan suci. Menyoroti bahwa perceraian, meskipun diperbolehkan dalam Islam, namun pada umumnya tidak dianjurkan, penelitian ini menguraikan bahwa perselisihan perkawinan, yang sering kali bersumber dari pertengkaran terus-menerus dan kesulitan ekonomi, merupakan penyebab utama perceraian. Data mengungkapkan terdapat 430 permohonan perceraian pada tahun 2024, dengan 76,74% disebabkan oleh konflik terus menerus dan 11,16% terkait dengan masalah ekonomi. Faktor-faktor lain termasuk meninggalkan pasangan, kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, kawin paksa, dan penyalahgunaan obat-obatan terlarang, meskipun persentasenya lebih kecil.
PLURALISME HUKUM ISLAM DAN TRANSFORMASI SOSIAL: ANALISIS KONSEPTUAL KRITIS TERHADAP MASYARAKAT MUSLIM KONTEMPORER Ana Billah; Ninda Dwi Anggraeni
USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): April
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/rcrjr176

Abstract

The interaction of Islamic law, state law, and customary norms creates persistent questions of authority, adaptation, and justice in contemporary Muslim societies. This article examines how plural legal orders are conceptually constituted, how transformations in social expectations challenge legal interpretation, and which normative conditions make pluralism compatible with substantive justice. The study employs normative legal research using exclusively a conceptual approach, examining legal doctrines and academic arguments published principally between 2013 and 2026. It distinguishes sharia, juristic interpretation, positive law, and socially practiced norms, thereby avoiding the assumption that these categories have equivalent institutional force. Three forms of legal interaction are conceptualized: accommodation, normative negotiation, and contestation. Social transformation is understood through interpretive, institutional, and cultural dimensions rather than as a linear movement from tradition to modernity. The principal contribution is a provisional evaluative framework of justice-oriented Islamic legal pluralism, consisting of institutional coordination, accountable interpretation, substantive rights protection, and effective access to remedies. The framework offers criteria for assessing plural legal authority without claiming empirically measured effects across societies. The analysis concludes that normative plurality should be judged through the reasons, procedures, and protections by which competing legal claims are recognized and resolved.
Co-Authors Ana Billah Fauziyah Putri Meilinda M. Tosen Nur Fadilah Dwi Winarni