Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kontribusi Inovasi Kelapa Sawit dan Perlindungan Melalui Hak Kekayaan Intelektual terhadap Krisis Komoditas Ekspor Ade Maulia Cahyani; Aditya Catur Pamungkas; Galuh Rizky; Isyana Alif Marthani; Ribka Yuniar; Suaibatul Aslamiyyah; Yuliana Yuliana
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): September : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i5.1205

Abstract

The palm oil industry is a vital component of Indonesia's economy, significantly contributing to foreign exchange earnings and employment opportunities, particularly in rural and plantation-based regions where economic alternatives are limited. However, the sector is increasingly challenged by global sustainability concerns, particularly the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which poses a threat to Indonesia’s palm oil exports due to its strict environmental standards and traceability requirements. This study adopts a descriptive qualitative approach using a literature review to explore the role of innovation and legal protection in strengthening the sustainability and global competitiveness of Indonesia’s palm oil industry. Specifically, it investigates how the development of superior plant varieties and the application of Plant Variety Protection (PVP) under the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) framework contribute to long-term industry resilience. The findings indicate that superior varieties such as DxP Topaz, DxP PTPN V, and Lonsum DxP have been instrumental in boosting productivity, reducing the need for land expansion, enhancing oil yield per hectare, and improving overall resource efficiency. Moreover, legal protection through PVP not only secures exclusive rights for breeders but also incentivizes further agricultural innovation and prevents the unauthorized use and duplication of valuable genetic resources. In light of international regulatory pressures, strengthening the national PVP system, promoting the registration of local superior varieties, and integrating legal instruments with research and development are essential. These efforts can safeguard Indonesia’s genetic sovereignty and support sustainable practices in compliance with international environmental standards. Ultimately, aligning agricultural innovation with a robust legal framework is key to maintaining the industry’s market access, environmental credibility, and long-term sustainability.
Analisis Hukum Aksi Balasan Tiongkok Menaikkan Tarif Impor Terhadap AS dalam Kerangka Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa WTO Suaibatul Aslamiyyah; Mika Anwarita; Edi Junaidi; Suharti Rossani Aritonang; Ribka Yuniar; Ade Maulia Cahyani; Febriana Adtikah Sari; Carissa Intan Ramadhani; Eplin Alperedoh
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 3 Nom
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v3i3.191

Abstract

The increase in import tariffs imposed by the United States on Chinese products has triggered an escalation of international trade conflicts commonly referred to as a trade war. In response, China adopted retaliatory measures by raising import tariffs on products originating from the United States. This study aims to analyze the legality of such retaliatory actions within the framework of the dispute settlement system of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, through an examination of the provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 and the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). The findings indicate that although the actions of the United States potentially violate its bound tariff commitments under the WTO, China’s retaliatory measures undertaken without authorization from the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) are also inconsistent with the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. This study underscores the importance of compliance with the multilateral dispute settlement system in order to maintain stability in international trade.