Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Contrarius
Ravi Danendra
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Inconsistency on the Right to Build: Investment, Agrarian Rights, and Constitution Lego Karjoko; Jaelani, Abdul Kadir; Ravi Danendra
Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jsderi.v3i2.106

Abstract

The legal duration of the Right to Build (Hak Guna Bangunan) in the new capital city has raised concerns due to inconsistencies across regulatory frameworks. Current policies suggest that HGB may be granted for up to 160 years in two cycles, creating potential conflict with previous legal norms that provide for shorter durations. This study aims to assess the legal validity of the extended tenure of HGB within the context of national land law and to propose a justice-oriented regulatory model. The research adopts a normative legal method, utilizing primary and secondary legal materials, with a statutory and conceptual approach. The findings of this study are twofold: First, the regulation concerning HGB in the new capital lacks legal validity based on Lon L. Fuller’s theory of legal systems, as it contains ambiguous provisions, contradicts existing laws, and undermines legal certainty due to the possibility of frequent changes. Second, a just regulatory model should be grounded in the broader public interest and aligned with the moral and philosophical foundations of the national ideology, particularly the principle of social justice, to ensure equitable land access and promote sustainable capital development.
Unprotected Land Ownership Rights in Corporate Land Acquisition Lego Karjoko; Nabila Rahma Safitri; Ravi Danendra
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i1.261

Abstract

Land ownership conflicts in Indonesia frequently emerge in plantation regions when local communities cultivate land in fact while corporations assert formal legal control over the same land. This situation generates agrarian disputes that expose structural tensions between the formal land certification regime and long-established patterns of community land use. This study examines the philosophical orientation underlying judicial reasoning in adjudicating disputes concerning Land Use Rights held by PT Perkebunan Nusantara Persero and evaluates the degree of legal protection granted to communities that cultivate land without formal certificates. The research applies a normative legal method through statutory and case approaches. The study relies on primary and secondary legal materials gathered through systematic literature review and analyzes them using deductive reasoning and interpretative analysis. The findings demonstrate that judicial panels in five cases placed primary emphasis on formal legal certainty by prioritizing documentary evidence of title and by disregarding factual realities related to community cultivation. This approach directs adjudication toward procedural compliance and limits consideration of substantive justice and social utility. The analysis further shows that the legal system has not provided adequate protection for affected communities. Effective preventive protection requires clearer regulatory arrangements governing land control by communities and state-owned enterprises. Effective repressive protection requires judges to assess both formal documentation and material evidence in a balanced manner. The study concludes that current judicial practice has not achieved equitable legal protection for communities engaged in cultivated land use.
Co-Authors Abdul Kadir Lego Karjoko Nabila Rahma Safitri