<![CDATA[The growing application of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) in Muslim contexts suggests the need to examine the legal and ethical implications of surrogacy in the framework of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah (the objectives of Islamic law). Therefore, this study aims to assess the compatibility of surrogacy, both traditional and gestational forms, with the core objectives of Sharīʿah, particularly the preservation of religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), life (ḥifẓ an-nafs), lineage (ḥifẓ al-nasl), and wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl). The methodology was based on a comprehensive textual analysis of Islamic legal sources, including the Qur’an, Sunnah, classical juristic writings, contemporary fatwas, and modern bioethical debates. By examining the materials, the analysis explored how surrogacy introduced legal and moral disruptions, particularly concerning lineage (nasab), maternal identity, inheritance, and the sanctity of the marital relationship. The results showed that surrogacy practices contradicted essential objectives of Islamic law by generating uncertainty in family structures, severing the connection between biological and legal motherhood, as well as undermining principles critical to Islamic family jurisprudence. These concerns were affirmed by the near-consensus among major Islamic juristic bodies, which categorized surrogacy as impermissible (ḥarām). The originality of this study is grounded in the systematic application of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah to a contemporary bioethical issue, showing the depth and coherence of Islamic legal reasoning in regulating modern reproductive technologies. In conclusion, enacting clear legislative prohibitions is recommended in Muslim-majority countries as well as continuous ijtihād to evaluate future biomedical developments in maqāṣid framework.]]>
