Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Nizam: Indonesian Journal of Research and Community Service
M. Minanur Rohman
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
MELAMPAUI POPULISME ISLAM M. Minanur Rohman
Al-Nizam: Indonesian Journal of Research and Community Service Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Al-Nizam: Indonesian Journal of Research and Community Service
Publisher : Al-Nizam: Indonesian Journal of Research and Community Service

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstrak: Gerakan populisme Islam mendapatkan momentum di Indonesia. Dalam artikel ini, penulis berfokus pada pertanyaan bagaimana melampaui sentimen populisme Islam ini dalam ruang publik. Alih-alih mengucilkan suara populis Islam, artikel ini menawarkan teori populisme progresif Chantal Mouffe dan mengandaikan bahwa populisme progresif Chantal Mouffe pada akhirnya kompatibel untuk melampaui populisme Islam. Penelitian ini memperkenalkan tiga konsep kunci dari pemikiran Mouffe yang dapat menjadi model untuk melampaui populisme Islam di Indonesia, antara lain distingsi antara politik dan yang politis, demokrasi agonistik, dan populisme progresif. Kata Kunci: Populisme Islam, Populisme Progresif, Chantal Mouffe
Etika Kecerdasan Buatan Berbasis Maqasid as-Syariah M. Minanur Rohman
Al-Nizam: Indonesian Journal of Research and Community Service Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Al-Nizam: Indonesian Journal of Research and Community Service
Publisher : Muntaha Noor Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The technological advancements of the twenty-first century, driven by the exponential rise of artificial intelligence (AI), have ushered in a new era offering numerous conveniences. However, the development of AI has also raised ethical questions. This article aims to investigate the ethical concerns by exploring the consequences of AI and interrogating its various ethical dimensions. The paper explains the ethical implications of AI advancements and proposes an AI ethics framework based on Maqasid as-Syariah (the objectives of Islamic law) as an alternative ethical system for governing AI. The article concludes that this distinct Islamic virtue-based ethics approach can be utilized to holistically explore ethical issues related to AI due to its ontological foundation and rich tradition. Maqasid-based ethics is grounded in five fundamental components: the preservation of life, religion, intellect, lineage, and wealth. This Maqasid-based AI ethics can serve as a valuable addition to the global discourse on AI ethics
KRITIK TAFSIR TEOLOGIS DALAM PERDEBATAN IMAMAH: Analisis atas Ayat Mawaddah, Wilayah dan Tathhir antara Ibn Taimiyyah dan Ibn al-Muthahhar M. Minanur Rohman
Al-Nizam: Indonesian Journal of Research and Community Service Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Al-Nizam: Indonesian Journal of Research and Community Service
Publisher : Muntaha Noor Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to comparatively analyze the interpretations of Ibn al-Muthahhar al-Hilli and the critiques of Ibn Taymiyyah regarding three theological verses in the Qur'an: the verse of mawaddah (Qur'an 42:23), the verse of wilayah (Qur'an 5:55), and the verse of tathhir (Qur'an 33:33). This research employs a qualitative approach based on library research, integrating comparative exegesis analysis and argumentation theory, particularly Stephen Toulmin’s model. The findings indicate that Ibn al-Muthahhar al-Hilli constructs his interpretations by integrating Qur'anic text, hadith reports, and theological inference to support the doctrine of imamah, while Ibn Taymiyyah offers systematic critiques through evaluating the validity of narrations, linguistic analysis, and restricting textual meaning. From an argumentative perspective, the main weakness in al-Hilli’s construction lies in the inferential link between evidence and claims, which is not always strong, whereas Ibn Taymiyyah’s strength lies in his ability to critique both the data and the basis of inference. However, Ibn Taymiyyah’s approach also demonstrates a restrictive tendency that limits broader theological interpretations. This study concludes that the debate between the two figures reflects a fundamental difference in hermeneutical paradigms: one emphasizing theological coherence and the other emphasizing epistemic caution. These findings contribute to the study of polemical exegesis and argumentation analysis within the Islamic intellectual tradition.
Co-Authors