Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jejaring Administrasi Publik (JAP) SIYAR (Social Issues by Academic Researhers) Journal
Riedho, M. Roehman Zainur
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
AI Nationalism in Shaping Global Governance Riedho, M. Roehman Zainur
SIYAR Journal Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): July
Publisher : The Department of International Relations, The Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/siyar.2025.5.2.186-217

Abstract

The rise of AI nationalism is fundamentally reshaping global governance, creating a new geopolitical landscape defined by technological competition. This research investigates how nations are increasingly leveraging artificial intelligence not just as a tool, but as a cornerstone of national power, economic strategy, and identity. Through a qualitative analysis employing a constructivist lens, this study examines the historical narratives, theoretical underpinnings, and policy manifestations of AI nationalism. It utilizes purposive sampling to select case studies of the United States, China, Russia, India, and Indonesia, representing a spectrum of global actors from superpowers to key emerging economies. The findings reveal that AI nationalism is not monolithic, leading to a proposed typology of three distinct models: Geopolitical Supremacy, State-Led Developmentalism, and Pragmatic Sovereignty. The study demonstrates how historical legacies of technological rivalry and colonialism continue to shape contemporary policies, fostering a zero-sum competitive environment that fragments international regulatory frameworks and deepens power asymmetries. It concludes that the current trajectory of AI nationalism, while driving innovation, poses significant risks to global stability and equitable development. This research affirms the urgent need for hybrid, multistakeholder governance models that can reconcile national interests with the necessity for international cooperation, ensuring that AI's transformative potential serves collective global interests rather than entrenching existing hierarchies.
Membangun Silogisme Pendekatan Naratif dalam Proses Pembuatan dan Analisis Kebijakan Publik William N. Dunn Riedho, M. Roehman Zainur; Angga, I Made Prastika
Jejaring Administrasi Publik Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024): Jejaring Administrasi Publik
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jap.v16i1.53502

Abstract

This research explains how to build a narrative approach syllogism in policy making and analysis using William N. Dunn's framework. The data used in this research uses secondary data from internet searches and literature from reputable journals. This research uses a qualitative and descriptive approach. The conclusion of this research is the syllogism of the narrative approach in public policy studies, consisting of the narrative approach in qualitative research methods, the narrative policy framework (NPF), and the advocacy coalition framework (ACF). In public policy studies, the activities of the policy-making process are divided into two actors with different tasks: first, policymakers carry out agenda setting, formulation, adoption, implementation, and evaluation of policies. Meanwhile, the second actor is a policy analyst, whose job is to identify problems, forecast policies, recommend policies, and monitor and evaluate policies. Each stage can use a narrative approach syllogism, where policymakers can explain and understand whether a policy will impact individuals or communities, understand the experiences and perspectives of the community or other stakeholders, build community empathy and support, and identify unexpected consequences. For policy analysts, the narrative approach of the syllogism is useful in terms of understanding the impact of policies, identifying emerging problems and conflicts, organizing and presenting policy recommendations clearly and persuasively, assisting with efforts to identify emerging issues, identifying dominant and alternative narratives that shape policy debates, understanding the formation, maintenance, and role of coalitions in the policy process, and evaluating policy effectiveness and adjusting recommendations. Keywords: Public policy, syllogism, narrative approach, Narrative Policy Framework (NPF), Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)
Co-Authors Angga, I Made Prastika