Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Science and Applicative Technology
Haqiqi, Rian Bayu
Unknown Affiliation
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Earth & Planetary Sciences Engineering Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Mineralogical Characteristics and Critical Stress Variation in Rock Samples from Bukit Kunyit, Bandar Lampung Setiawan, Muhamad Ragil; Hilman, Zaki; Haqiqi, Rian Bayu; Farishi, Bilal Al
Journal of Science and Applicative Technology Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Science and Applicative Technology June Chapter
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM), Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Lampung Selatan, Lampung, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35472/jsat.v9i1.2026

Abstract

Mineralogy is essential for understanding rock formation processes and their physical properties, including critical stress. Critical stress values can be estimated using unconfined compressive strength (UCS) measurements, which depend on the modulus values of the minerals present. This study explores the mineralogical characteristics of rock samples from Bukit Kunyit, Bandar Lampung City, and Lampung through X-ray diffraction (XRD) and petrographic analysis. Macroscopic observations revealed two visually distinct rock samples: one with a bright color (Sample 1) and another with a darker hue (Sample 2). Despite these color differences, XRD analysis showed that both samples have the same mineral composition, including Anorthoclase, Cristobalite, Tridymite, and Muscovite, indicating a felsic (silica-rich) nature. Differences were noted in the crystallographic forms of Muscovite and Quartz content, with Sample 2 having a higher Quartz concentration. These mineralogical variations correlate with the observed differences in critical stress, with Sample 1 exhibiting a lower critical stress (20.98 MPa) than Sample 2 (35.05 MPa).
Co-Authors Farishi, Bilal Al Hilman, Zaki Setiawan, Muhamad Ragil