Febrianti Dwi Puspaningrum
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Comparative Study of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia and America: Religious and Legal Aspects Febrianti Dwi Puspaningrum; Christoper Theovino Adhi; Adrianus Sandy Darmawan Satrio
Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Sharia and Society: Navigating Faith, Law, and Modernity
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ciils.v2i1.31372

Abstract

Blasphemy laws serve as contentious intersections of religious belief and legal governance, reflecting the complex relationship between state authority and individual freedoms. This comparative study explores the dynamics of blasphemy laws in two diverse contexts: Indonesia and the United States. Indonesia, as the world's most populous Muslim-majority nation, exemplifies a predominantly Islamic legal framework, while the United States, renowned for its constitutional protections of free speech, offers a contrasting perspective rooted in secular principles. Drawing upon religious, cultural, and legal dimensions, this research scrutinizes the origins, evolution, and enforcement of blasphemy laws in both countries. It examines the socio-political contexts that shape interpretations of blasphemy, exploring the role of religion in public discourse and legal jurisprudence. Furthermore, it delves into case studies and landmark legal rulings to discern the practical implications of blasphemy laws on religious minorities, freedom of expression, and societal cohesion. By juxtaposing these two distinct legal landscapes, this study aims to illuminate the complexities inherent in navigating religious sensitivities within legal frameworks, as well as the broader implications for human rights and democratic governance. Through an interdisciplinary approach, it seeks to foster a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted interactions between religion, law, and society, thereby contributing to scholarly discourse and policy dialogue on issues of religious freedom and legal pluralism in an increasingly interconnected world.
Juridical Analysis of the Implementation of Handover of Housing Infrastructure, Facilities and Utilities Febrianti Dwi Puspaningrum; Suhadi, Suhadi
Annual Review of Legal Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/arls.vol1i3.11339

Abstract

Infrastructure, Facilities and Utilities are the basic physical equipment of a residential environment that meets certain standards for the needs of a decent residence. Providing and handing over Infrastructure, Facilities and Utilities is an obligation that the developer must fulfill when building housing. However, in Tangerang City, there are still many developers who have not handed over the Infrastructure, Facilities and Utilities even though the time period has passed, resulting in the abandonment of the Infrastructure, Facilities and Utilities. This research uses empirical juridical methods with a qualitative approach. Data collection techniques in this research used observation, interview and documentation techniques. The results of this research indicate that the inhibiting factor in handing over housing Infrastructure, Facilities and Utilities by developers to the government in Tangerang City is the abandonment of Infrastructure, Facilities and Utilities by developers whose whereabouts are unknown. Infrastructure, Facilities and Utilities that have not been handed over are managed entirely by the Developer, so that if the Developer's whereabouts cannot be known then the management of the Infrastructure, Facilities and Utilities will not work which will result in the abandonment.