Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers as Persuasive Function in Joe Biden’s Speech Remarks on Bidenomics 2023 Amalia, Andina Silvi; Sari, Rina
Journal of Language and Literature Vol 25, No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Sanata Dharma

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/joll.v25i1.8934

Abstract

This research aimed at finding the interpersonal metadiscourse markers in Joe Biden’s speech remarks on Bidenomics 2023. The researchers also attempted to comprehend in depth the context of interpersonal metadiscourse markers through discourse analysis by analyzing how a speaker used language to interact with the audiences, managing social relationship, and conveying meaning, therefore it used qualitative method. Dafouz’s (2008) theory was used to find the types of interpersonal metadiscourse markers, including Hedges, Certainty markers, Attributors, Attitude markers, and Commentaries. While Mai (2016) theory was also used to classify the types of interpersonal metadiscourse markers into the types of persuasive function in metadiscourse including Logos, Ethos, and Pathos. The researchers discovered 45 data of interpersonal metadiscourse in Joe Biden’s speech, including 4 hedges, 3 certainty markers, 8 attributors, 7 attitude markers, and 23 commentaries. This research also found that 45 interpersonal metadiscourse markers were categorized as persuasive function including 29 markers as ethos, and 27 markers as pathos. However, the types of persuasive function were totally 56 markers because self-mention in ethos, and engagement markers in pathos have the same representative of interpersonal metadiscourse markers which were taken from the type of commentaries. Overall, commentaries were the most frequent markers used by Joe Biden in his speech, while certainty markers were the most infrequent markers used by Joe Biden. Policy speech delivered by Joe Biden affected on how persuasive function was shaped.
From accuracy to fluency: Exploring EFL teachers’ perceptions of speaking assessment in pesantren-based school context Amalia, Andina Silvi; Mistar, Junaidi
Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/j-reall.v7i1.24461

Abstract

This study was motivated by the gap between the ideal framework of speaking assessment, which emphasizes grammatical accuracy as a primary indicator, and classroom practice in Islamic boarding schools (pesantren), where fluency and confidence are often prioritized over linguistic accuracy. Accordingly, this study explores EFL teachers’ perceptions of grammatical accuracy in speaking assessment and how these perceptions influence the design and implementation of assessment rubrics. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with three EFL teachers teaching at the elementary, intermediate, and advanced levels. The findings reveal that although grammatical accuracy is acknowledged as important, teachers tend to prioritize effective communication, fluency, and speaking confidence. The assessment rubrics applied are flexible and adapted to students’ backgrounds, proficiency levels, and learning needs. The study also confirms that teachers’ prior learning experiences, professional training, and personal beliefs significantly shape their assessment practices. However, the limited number of participants and the specific institutional context restrict the generalizability of the findings. The study highlights the importance of teacher training that promotes a holistic and contextual approach to speaking assessment, as such an approach may enhance learners’ communicative confidence, reduce speaking anxiety, and foster more active participation in English use within the pesantren environment. Future research is recommended to examine the long-term effects of improved speaking assessment practices on graduates’ social engagement and future opportunities.