Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha Mutiara : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia International Journal of Contemporary Sciences (IJCS)
Ni Ketut Wiratny
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 60/PID.B/2024/PN Amlapura Ni Ketut Ratih Ganeshwari Jaya; Ni Ketut Wiratny; Ida I Dewa Ayu Dwiyanti
Mutiara: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): JIMI - JULI
Publisher : PT. PENERBIT TIGA MUTIARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61404/mutiara.v3i3.423

Abstract

This study examines the enforcement of criminal law in relation to the offense of aggravated theft as adjudicated in the District Court Decision of Amlapura No. 60/PID.B/2024/PN Amlapura, wherein the Defendant, Jana alias Tobi, was found legally and convincingly guilty of committing aggravated theft as stipulated under Article 363 paragraph (1) point 4 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP). The objective of this research is to analyze the application of criminal law in the aforementioned case, with a particular focus on two principal legal issues: (1) how law enforcement was implemented in the case in question, and (2) how the judicial decision aligns with the foundational legal principles of justice, legal certainty, and utility. The research employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach, and utilizes both the theory of law enforcement and the theory of criminal acts as the conceptual framework. The findings indicate that all elements of the criminal offense under Article 363 paragraph (1) point 4 of the Penal Code were fulfilled, and that the panel of judges duly considered both aggravating and mitigating factors in a balanced manner. Nonetheless, further analysis reveals that the Defendant’s role in the commission of the offense was more auxiliary in nature, thereby suggesting that the normative application of Article 55 of the Penal Code would have been more appropriate. This misapplication of legal provisions potentially gives rise to substantive injustice and opens the possibility for further legal remedies. The study concludes that although the formal procedures of law enforcement were conducted in accordance with prevailing legal standards, there exists a substantive deficiency in the identification of the perpetrator’s role, which adversely affects the overall fairness of the verdict. The novelty of this research lies in its critical analysis of the accuracy of judicial application of substantive criminal norms and the imperative of rigorous judicial reasoning in sentencing, aimed at reinforcing the integrity and consistency of the Indonesian criminal justice system.
Restorative Justice Settlement of Fraud Crime Case (A Case Study in The North Kuta Badung Police Sector) Wijaya, I Made Guna; I Made Mulyawan Subawa; Ni Ketut Wiratny
International Journal of Contemporary Sciences (IJCS) Vol. 1 No. 10 (2024): August 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/ijcs.v1i10.10656

Abstract

Restorative justice is an approach in law enforcement that focuses more on recovery and reconciliation between perpetrators, victims, and the community rather than just imposing penalties to repair the social and emotional impact of criminal acts and rebuild damaged relationships. Settlement through restorative justice in its application there is still a conflict of legal norms between the Criminal Code and Perkap Number 8 of 2021 concerning handling criminal acts based on restorative justice in criminal law enforcement in Indonesia, this is because the article to ensnare the perpetrators of fraud is already available and only needs to be implemented, but the reality in the field is that there is still a vital justice approach, even though there have been peace efforts that should have stopped the investigation but the investigators are continuing because settlement through restorative justice cannot necessarily eliminate investigations and or investigations. The problem in this study is the settlement of restorative justice against fraud cases in the North Kuta Sector Police and the obstacles faced in the settlement through restorative justice against fraud cases
PRINSIP KEPENTINGAN TERBAIK BAGI ANAK DALAMDIVERSI PADA SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK Ni Ketut Wiratny
Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47532/gcnpx972

Abstract

Pasal 28 B ayat (2), Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indosesia Tahun 1945 setiap anak berhak atas kelangsungan hidup, tumbuh dan berkembang serta berhak atas perlindungan kekerasan dan diskriminasi, Perlindungan hak-hak anak terdapat dalam konvensi PBB tentang hak-hak anak (Convention on the Rights of the Child the Child) tahun 1989, telah diratifikasi oleh lebih 191 negara, termasuk Indonesia sebagai anggota PBB melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 1990. Dengan demikian konvensi PBB tersebut telah menjadi hukum Indonesia dan mengikat seluruh warga negara Indonesia. Untuk melaksanakan ketentuan yang termatub di dalam konvensi hak-hak anak. serta prinsip-prinsip dasar Konvensi Hak-Hak Anak meliputi: a).non diskriminasi;b)kepentingan yang terbaik bagi anak; c)hak untuk hidup, kelangsungan hidup, dan perkembangan; dan d)penghargaan terhadap pendapat anak. Prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak atau dalam bahasa Inggris disebut dengan the best interests of children adalah prinsip dasar yang menjadi dasar dalam perlindungan anak. Kepentingan terbaik anak harus dipandang sebagai ‘paramount importance’ atau prioritas utama. Prinsip ini termuat dalam hukum internasional dan hukum nasional terkait dengan perlindungan anak. Anak harus dilindungi, sekalipun anak tersebut adalah anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum. Prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Poin 14.2 The Beijing Rules yang menyatakan “The proceedings shall be conducive to the best interests of the juvenile and shall be conducted in an atmosphere of understanding, which shall allow the juvenile to participate therein and to express herself or himself freely.” (Terjemahan: Proses tersebut harus dilakukan untuk kepentingan terbaik anak dan harus dilakukan dalam atmosfir pemahaman, yang memungkinkan anak tersebut untuk berpartisipasi di dalamnya dan untuk mengekspresikan dirinya atau dirinya sendiri secara bebas). Dalam tataran hukum nasional, prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak diatur dalam Pasal 2 Undangundang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan anak. Prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak (best interest of the child) mengingatkan kepada semua penyelenggara perlindungan anak bahwa pertimbangan-pertimbangan dalam pengambilan keputusan menyangkut masa depan anak dan bukan pembalasan serta penempatan pidana penjara atau penahanan anak sebagai upaya atau obat terakhir yang bersifat ultimum remedium Penyelesaian Perkara pidana anak tidak untuk menghukum tetapi mendidik, mengembalikan dan memulihkannya sebagaimana sebelum terjadinya tindak pidana.
Co-Authors I Made Mulyawan Subawa Ida I Dewa Ayu Dwiyanti Ni Ketut Ratih Ganeshwari Jaya Wijaya, I Made Guna