Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Impact of Chronic Pain on Epilepsy: A Systematic Review Yaffie Noor Rochim; Raras Windaswara; Kuswanto; Frida puspitasari; Yaffie Mohammad Rizaq
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 15 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/8m669990

Abstract

Introduction: Epilepsy and chronic pain represent two of the most burdensome neurological conditions globally, each contributing significantly to disability and reduced quality of life. Emerging evidence suggests a clinical and pathophysiological overlap that is far greater than coincidental, pointing toward a synergistic negative impact when they co-occur. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the multifaceted impact of chronic pain on the clinical course, psychosocial well-being, and overall burden of epilepsy. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify relevant literature, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and observational cohort studies. Search terms encompassed epilepsy, seizure disorders, chronic pain, neuropathic pain, migraine, and fibromyalgia. Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria, and data were extracted and synthesized across key outcome domains, including epidemiology, pathophysiology, seizure control, quality of life, neuropsychiatric status, cognitive function, and socioeconomic burden. Results: The epidemiological data reveal a stark disparity: 40.2% of adults with active epilepsy report chronic pain, a rate double that of the general population (20.0%). This comorbidity is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including the potential for increased seizure frequency, mediated by pain-induced chronic stress. The impact on patient well-being is profound, with comorbid pain compounding the already significant reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) seen in epilepsy. The neuropsychiatric burden is dramatically amplified; notably, the presence of chronic pain is associated with a nearly four-fold increased risk of suicidal ideation in individuals with epilepsy (OR=3.86). This dyad also exacerbates cognitive deficits, sleep disturbances, and challenges in treatment adherence due to polypharmacy and increased side-effect burden. Consequently, the socioeconomic costs, both direct and indirect, are substantially magnified. Discussion: The findings underscore a complex, bidirectional relationship between chronic pain and epilepsy, likely driven by shared neurobiological mechanisms including neuronal hyperexcitability, central sensitization, and dysfunction of inhibitory GABAergic pathways. The therapeutic overlap of certain antiepileptic drugs further supports this mechanistic link. The clinical implications are significant, highlighting the inadequacy of treating epilepsy in isolation when chronic pain is present. The synergistic negative effects on mental health, QoL, and even suicide risk necessitate a paradigm shift in clinical practice. Conclusion: Chronic pain is not merely a passive comorbidity but a critical, disease-modifying factor that actively worsens the clinical trajectory and overall burden of epilepsy. Its presence undermines treatment efficacy and dramatically increases patient suffering and mortality risk. These findings advocate for the universal screening of pain and associated psychiatric conditions in epilepsy care and the implementation of integrated, multidisciplinary management strategies to improve patient outcomes.
A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Approaches for Pediatric Epilepsy: An Evidence-Based Framework from Clinical Assessment to Precision Medicine Raras Windaswara; Yaffie Noor Rochim
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 15 No. 5 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/sdv3f613

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric epilepsy is a common and heterogeneous neurological disorder, and an accurate, timely diagnosis is paramount for guiding treatment, determining prognosis, and improving long-term outcomes. The diagnostic paradigm has evolved from a descriptive, seizure-based classification to a comprehensive, multi-axial framework focused on establishing an underlying etiology. This systematic review synthesizes the current evidence on the diagnostic approaches for pediatric epilepsy, from foundational clinical evaluation to advanced molecular and neuroimaging techniques. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cohort studies, and clinical guidelines published on the diagnosis of epilepsy in children (age ≤ 18 years). Studies were selected based on their evaluation of the utility, diagnostic yield, predictive value, and clinical impact of various diagnostic modalities. Data were extracted and synthesized according to a tiered diagnostic pathway. Results: The diagnostic process begins with a meticulous clinical history and neurological examination, which remain the cornerstone for differentiating epileptic seizures from paroxysmal non-epileptic events (PNEEs). Misdiagnosis remains a significant challenge, with up to 39% of children referred to tertiary centers for refractory epilepsy ultimately found not to have the condition. Electroencephalography (EEG) is the principal ancillary test, with an initial diagnostic yield of approximately 52%; this can be enhanced by provocation techniques and sleep deprivation. Long-term video-EEG monitoring (VEM) is the gold standard for resolving diagnostic uncertainty, achieving a definitive diagnosis in over 75% of complex cases. However, EEG interpretation is subject to significant inter-observer variability. Structural neuroimaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) identifies an epileptogenic lesion in 33-44% of children, a yield that is substantially increased by advanced post-processing techniques in MRI-negative cases. Functional neuroimaging (PET, SPECT, MEG) and genetic testing represent the frontier of etiological diagnosis. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) can localize epileptogenic foci in MRI-negative patients with high accuracy, guiding successful surgical intervention. Genetic testing, particularly exome and genome sequencing, provides the highest diagnostic yield, identifying a causative variant in 25-48% of cases, especially in infants with early-onset and severe epilepsies. A genetic diagnosis directly impacts clinical management in up to 85% of diagnosed children. Economic analyses demonstrate that early, comprehensive genetic testing is more cost-effective than traditional, protracted sequential investigations. Discussion: The evidence supports a paradigm shift away from a rigid, sequential diagnostic model toward a flexible, phenotype-driven approach. For severe, early-onset epilepsies, rapid exome or genome sequencing should be considered a first- or second-line investigation rather than a last resort. The integration of multimodal data—clinical, electrophysiological, imaging, and genomic—is essential for accurate diagnosis, particularly in drug-resistant and MRI-negative epilepsy. Conclusion: The modern diagnostic evaluation of pediatric epilepsy is a multi-faceted process that leverages a synergistic combination of clinical acumen and advanced technology. An accurate and timely etiological diagnosis is not merely an academic exercise but a critical intervention that directly informs precision therapy, improves seizure control, and fundamentally alters the life course for children with epilepsy and their families.