Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis Of The Election Supervision System In Indonesia: A Comparison Between Simultaneous And Non-Simultaneous Elections Kausar Jumahir Lesen
International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 03 (2025): June - August, International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Scien
Publisher : Cita konsultindo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63922/ijevss.v4i03.2206

Abstract

This article will describe the various forms of the election oversight system in Indonesia, starting from the Old Order era to reform (from Panwaslak to Bawaslu; from Pilkada not simultaneously and concurrently). However, there are various kinds of problems in the supervision of elections in Indonesia, including manipulation of nomination requirements, invalidity of voter data, money politics in campaigns, abuse of authority and intervention of power structures, as well as inflating the results of vote acquisition as a common phenomenon in almost every election implementation, which involves election organizers, election participants and/or the public as voters. Thus, the existence of election supervisors in political and administrative law reviews is important to avoid delegitimizing the election process and results, as well as anticipating the development of various acts of election violations, in order to strengthen public confidence in various problems in the electoral system. The existence of strong election supervisors is inseparable from the importance of oversight mechanisms for the realization of quality elections 5
Legal Analysis Of The Implementation Of The Presidential Threshold In General Elections In Indonesia Kausar Jumahir Lesen
International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 03 (2025): June - August, International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Scien
Publisher : Cita konsultindo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63922/ijevss.v4i03.2207

Abstract

Presidential Threshold concept reduces the rights of everyone to get equal opportunities in government. Constitutional Court Decision Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUUXI/2013 which decided that the Presidential and Vice Presidential Elections were held simultaneously with the Elections of the People's Representative Council or known as simultaneous elections. The regulation of the presidential nomination threshold (Presidential Threshold) is essentially an open legal policy. The source of attribution authority in the constitution, especially in Article 6A paragraph (2) and Article 22E paragraph (6) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia as a higher legal norm, does not regulate or provide restrictions for anyone who wants to nominate themselves as a candidate for President and Vice President. The existence of a threshold for political parties to have the right to nominate presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs has legal implications, including violating the 1945 Constitution concerning the Presidential System, contradicting Article 6A paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, the inconsistency of the Constitutional Court in Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 and violating the rights of citizens in the 1945 Constitution.