Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Contemporary Public Administration Review (CoPAR)
Ramjit, Dana-Marie
Unknown Affiliation
Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Reconceptualizing Human Capital Through Multicentric Digital Governance & Cross-Border Synchronization Ramjit, Dana-Marie
Contemporary Public Administration Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Contemporary Public Administration Review (CoPAR)
Publisher : Department of Public Administration, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/copar.v3i1.9352

Abstract

This paper interrogates the transformation of human capital governance under the accelerating energies of digital globalization and technological innovation. It identifies a central governance problem: existing institutional arrangements are increasingly inadequate to address the ethical, distributive, and social challenges posed by algorithmic systems, digital platforms, and data-driven decision-making. While prior research has explored digital governance in areas such as e-government and automation, little attention has been paid to how these dynamics are reshaping human capital governance as a multi-scalar and ethically charged domain. The purpose of this study is to analyze these transformations and advance the concepts of multicentric digital governance and cross-border synchronization, which reconceptualize workforce governance as an adaptive, pluriversal, and participatory process. The discussion highlights the dual challenge of leveraging digital tools to enhance efficiency and inclusion while mitigating risks such as bias, commodification, and inequality. The paper concludes by outlining policy solutions that balance innovation with principled oversight, offering a framework for building resilient, equitable, and ethically grounded structures of human capital governance in the digital age. The conceptual framework advanced in this study offers insights for the broader governance and organizational studies literature, illustrating how digitalization reshapes authority, ethics, and stakeholder engagement across sectors.
Reconceptualizing Human Capital Through Multicentric Digital Governance & Cross-Border Synchronization Ramjit, Dana-Marie
Contemporary Public Administration Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Contemporary Public Administration Review (CoPAR)
Publisher : Department of Public Administration, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/copar.v3i1.9352

Abstract

This paper interrogates the transformation of human capital governance under the accelerating energies of digital globalization and technological innovation. It identifies a central governance problem: existing institutional arrangements are increasingly inadequate to address the ethical, distributive, and social challenges posed by algorithmic systems, digital platforms, and data-driven decision-making. While prior research has explored digital governance in areas such as e-government and automation, little attention has been paid to how these dynamics are reshaping human capital governance as a multi-scalar and ethically charged domain. The purpose of this study is to analyze these transformations and advance the concepts of multicentric digital governance and cross-border synchronization, which reconceptualize workforce governance as an adaptive, pluriversal, and participatory process. The discussion highlights the dual challenge of leveraging digital tools to enhance efficiency and inclusion while mitigating risks such as bias, commodification, and inequality. The paper concludes by outlining policy solutions that balance innovation with principled oversight, offering a framework for building resilient, equitable, and ethically grounded structures of human capital governance in the digital age. The conceptual framework advanced in this study offers insights for the broader governance and organizational studies literature, illustrating how digitalization reshapes authority, ethics, and stakeholder engagement across sectors.
Participatory Governance in Multicentric Systems Ramjit, Dana-Marie
Contemporary Public Administration Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Contemporary Public Administration Review (CoPAR)
Publisher : Department of Public Administration, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/copar.v3i2.9658

Abstract

Contemporary public administration has shifted from hierarchical, state-centric models toward multilevel and multicentric governance, in which authority is dispersed across governments, markets, civil society, and citizens. While citizen participation and co-production are central to legitimacy, inclusiveness, and public service performance, structural inequalities, power asymmetries, and coordination challenges frequently constrain meaningful influence, producing engagement that is often symbolic rather than substantive. Drawing on postinternationalist theory, this paper conceptualizes governance as a turbulent, fragmented, and overlapping system characterized by distant proximities, where interdependence coexists with unequal access to power. It examines how these dynamics shape citizen participation, highlighting how structural, relational, and digital inequalities mediate the translation of presence into influence. The analysis integrates empirical examples from diverse governance contexts to illustrate the risks of co-optation and agenda capture and identifies drivers and barriers of substantive participation. Practically, the paper offers guidance for public managers, emphasizing heterarchical leadership, adaptive coordination, and the design of participatory mechanisms that ensure inclusiveness, accountability, and measurable public value. By linking theoretical insights on turbulence, fragmegration, and distant proximities with strategies for public administration, the paper reframes citizen engagement not as a bureaucratic add-on, but as a structurally conditioned determinant of legitimacy, innovation, and effectiveness in complex governance systems.
Co-Authors