p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MRB
Rahakbauw, Oktovina Deci
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN, DISIPLIN KERJA, DAN MOTIVASI, TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PT FABER CASTELL JAKARTA BARAT Rahakbauw, Oktovina Deci; Pujaka, Gia
Management Research and Business Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Edisi : Agustus 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bhakti Pembangunan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64237/mrb.v3i1.102

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of leadership style, work discipline, and motivation on employee performance at PT Faber Castell, West Jakarta. The data used in this study are primary data obtained from questionnaires. The population was 110 respondents, using a saturated sampling method. Data collection was conducted through questionnaires distributed to 110 consumers. The results of the study showed that the t-value for leadership style was 1.989 > t-table 1.9826, with a significance level of 0.049 < 0.05, indicating that H1 was accepted. Therefore, the first hypothesis states that leadership style has a positive and significant partial effect on employee performance. The results of the study showed that the t-value for work discipline was 5.478 > t-table 1.9826, with a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05, indicating that H2 was accepted. Therefore, the second hypothesis states that work discipline has a positive and significant partial effect on employee performance. The research results show that the t-test for motivation is 6.985 < t-table 1.9826 with a significance level of 0.000 < 0.5, indicating that H3 is accepted. Therefore, the third hypothesis states that motivation has a positive and significant partial effect on employee performance variables. The F-test for all variables shows an F-test of 158.539 > F-table 2.69 and a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05. This means that the hypothesis stating that leadership style, work discipline, and motivation simultaneously have a positive and significant influence on employee performance, therefore H4 is accepted. The coefficient of determination test value of 0.813 indicates that employee performance can be explained by leadership style, work discipline, and motivation at 81.3%, while the remaining 18.7% is influenced by other factors that may have a greater influence on PT Faber Castell West Jakarta's customers.
ANALISIS PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN, MOTIVASI DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA PT TIOKINDO ELECTRIC Rahakbauw, Oktovina Deci; Berliana, Rizma
Management Research and Business Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Edisi : Januari 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bhakti Pembangunan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64237/mrb.v2i2.89

Abstract

This research aims to determine the influence of Leadership Style, Motivation and WorkDiscipline on Employee Performance at PT Tiokindo Electric. The data used in this research ispremier data obtained from distributing questionnaires. The total population was 41 respondentsusing a saturated sample, so data collection was carried out by distributing questionnaires to 41employees. The data analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis, with coefficientof determination analysis, t test and F test, multiple linear regression analysis produces theequation Y = 1.815 + 0.283X1 + 0.615X2 + 0.438X3. The employee coefficient test results are 0.709or 70.9% of performance is influenced by the variables of leadership style, motivation and workdiscipline. Meanwhile, the remaining 29.1% was influenced by other factors not explained in thisstudy. The results of the t test show that Leadership Style (X1) has a tcount of 2.315 and a ttableof 1.687, the value of tcount > ttable where 2.315 > 1.687, apart from that, the significant value is0.026, the value is 0.026 < 0.05, so Ha1 is accepted and Ho1 is rejected. Motivation (X2) has atcount of 2.727 and a t table of 1.687, the value of tcount > ttable where 2.727 > 1.687, apart fromthat, the significant value is 0.010, the value is 0.010 < 0.05, so Ha2 is accepted and Ho2 is rejected.Work Discipline (X3) has a tcount of 1.917 and a ttable of 1.687, a value of tcount > ttable where1.917 > 1.687, apart from that, the significant value is 0.063, a value of 0.063 < 0.05, so Ha3 isrejected and Ho3 is accepted. So the variables Leadership Style, Motivation have a positive andsignificant effect partially and Work Discipline has no significant effect partially. The significantvalue of the F test results is 0.000, which is smaller than 0.05. It can be concluded that there is asimultaneous influence between Leadership Style, Motivation and Work Discipline on EmployeePerformance.