Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bulletin of Indonesian Islamic Studies AL ITQAN: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an
Aufa Varrassyah Nawwaf
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
EPISTEMOLOGI TAFSIR MIN HUDĀ AL-QUR`ĀN KARYA MUḤAMMAD TAQĪ AL-MUDARRISĪ Aufa Varrassyah Nawwaf
AL ITQAN: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Al ITQAN: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an
Publisher : STAI AL-ANWAR SARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47454/alitqan.v9i2.982

Abstract

Min Hudā Al-Qurān is an interpretation that has its own color and orientation within the discourse of Shia exegesis since it’s not trapped in the ideological vortex like most Shia interpretations. Its author, Muḥammad Taqī al-Mudarrisī, aims to create an interpretation that responds to social issues by reflecting on empirical realities. This research is necessary to reveal the essence, trace the sources and methods, and test the validity of the interpretation. This is a qualitative library research. The results of this research are as follows: First, al-Mudarrisī believes that interpretation must carry a pragmatic spirit and be able to provide solutions to community issues. Second, al-Mudarrisī’s interpretation is majority based on empirical realities and rational logics. The Qur'an, reality, and reason are dialogued using a functional paradigm. Third, the method used is al-manhaj al-taḥlīlī min khilāli al-rabṭ al-mawḍū’ī. Al-Mudarrisī systematically and sequentially analyzes the verses that have previously been grouped into a unified theme. Al-Mudarrisī also adopts al-manhaj al-tadabbur al-mubāshar, or direct contemplation of the Qur'anic verses. Fourth, Min Hudā Al-Qurān cannot be considered one hundred percent valid, whether in terms of coherence, correspondence, or pragmatism.
Shariatisation in Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis of Firanda Andirja’s and Buya Yahya’s Interpretation of Surah Al-Mā’idah 44 Aufa Varrassyah Nawwaf; Nabiela Berliana
Bulletin of Indonesian Islamic Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Bulletin of Indonesian Islamic Studies
Publisher : KURAS Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51214/biis.v4i2.1602

Abstract

The idea to formalize Sharia law in Indonesia, a country characterized by its pluralism, remains the subject of ongoing debate. This discussion is fueled by diverse interpretations of Surah Al-Mā`idah 44. This article aims to analyze Firanda Andirja's interpretation as a Salafist preacher to confirm his textuality and compare it with Buya Yahya's interpretation as a non-Salafi preacher who has ties to the initiator of NKRI Bersyariah. Employing a qualitative approach alongside Norman Fairclough's discourse analysis theory, this study conducts a thorough examination of two YouTube videos that feature their interpretations. The findings indicate that their perspectives exhibit notable similarities in three main areas: both refrain from advocating for a movement to formalize Sharia, present negative portrayals of certain groups, and avoid declaring others as kāfir altogether. However, there are significant differences in how each party categorizes individuals who do not implement Sharia, as well as variations in their orientation to discourse production. Furthermore, this paper contends that Firanda's interpretation of Surah Al-Mā`idah 44 cannot be seen as purely textual, as it involves a reconsideration of the meaning of kāfir. Therefore, Abdullah Saeed’s categorization of Salafists as textualists and Quintan Wiktorowicz’s claim that Salafists avoid using rationality need to be reappraised, since these two matters may be applicable and relevant at the macro level rather than the micro level.
Co-Authors Nabiela Berliana