Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal TIN: TERAPAN INFORMATIKA NUSANTARA
Asyfiya, Dzurrotu Umi
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Arts Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Algoritma Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, dan Random Forest Untuk Analisis Sentimen Komentar Politik Youtube Santoso, Bayu Aji; Nugroho, Bangkit Indarmawan; Asyfiya, Dzurrotu Umi
TIN: Terapan Informatika Nusantara Vol 6 No 4 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi (FKPT)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/tin.v6i4.8326

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is an important field in natural language processing that is widely used to understand public opinion on social media. This study compares the performance of three machine learning algorithms, namely Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest, in analyzing YouTube comment sentiment. The dataset consists of 15,257 comments obtained from the Indonesia Lawyers Club (ILC) and Rakyat Bersuara channels. The research process includes preprocessing stages (cleaning, case folding, tokenizing, normalization with a slang dictionary, stopword removal, and stemming), data labeling with a Lexicon-based approach using InSet Lexicon, data division with a ratio of 80% training data and 20% test data, and evaluation using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics, complemented by K-fold cross validation tests. The results of the sentiment distribution show a dominance of negative sentiment at 43.2%, followed by neutral at 34.9%, and positive at 21.9%. Model evaluation showed that SVM excelled with 83.52% accuracy, 83.55% precision, 83.52% recall, and 83.52% F1-score, followed by Random Forest with 77.20% accuracy, while Naïve Bayes achieved the lowest result at 64.71%. The K-Fold test further strengthened these results, with the best accuracy of 84.14% for SVM. Thus, SVM can be concluded as the most effective algorithm for analyzing political comment sentiment on YouTube.
Co-Authors Bangkit Indarmawan Nugroho Santoso, Bayu Aji