Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

OPTIMASI MODEL DETEKSI ALERGEN PADA PRODUK PANGAN DENGAN ALGORITMA SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE (SVM) DAN ADAPTIVE BOOSTING (ADABOOST) Siska Narulita; Sekarlangit; Milka Putri Novianingrum
Jurnal Teknologi Informasi: Jurnal Keilmuan dan Aplikasi Bidang Teknik Informatika Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Teknologi Informasi : Jurnal Keilmuan dan Aplikasi Bidang Teknik Inform
Publisher : Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47111/jti.v19i2.21316

Abstract

One important aspect that needs to be considered in food production is food safety. The implementation of this food safety aspect includes food products that avoid contamination of chemical, physical, and biological substances that can be harmful to human health. In the implementation of the Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) program, problems were found related to allergies in the recipients of this assistance program. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), food allergies are ranked as the fourth most serious public health problem, and the only effective treatment for allergy sufferers is to avoid foods that contain allergens. Allergens themselves are compounds or food ingredients that cause allergies and/or intolerances. Laboratory tests of food products for allergen testing that are still carried out traditionally require a lot of time and money, making food producers reluctant to carry out product testing. A way to detect allergen content in food products that is easier, more practical, and more accurate is needed. The research conducted aims to build a prediction model that can be used to detect allergen content in food ingredients through the implementation of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) data mining algorithm optimized with the Adaptive Boosting ensemble learning boosting algorithm (AdaBoost). The research conducted obtained a model that produces the most optimal performance, namely SVM optimized with the AdaBoost algorithm with the split validation method.
Deteksi Alergen pada Produk Pangan Menggunakan Algoritma Support Vector Machines (SVM) Siska Narulita; Sekarlangit Sekarlangit; Milka Putri Novianingrum
Bridge : Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi dan Telekomunikasi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Bridge: Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi dan Telekomunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Teknik Elektro dan Informatika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/bridge.v3i1.393

Abstract

Food allergies are medical conditions caused by particular immunological reactions brought on by exposure to certain foods. All age groups can experience food allergies, albeit the prevalence varies between children and adults, with children experiencing this condition more frequently than adults. Find food ingredients or substances that can trigger allergies, often known as allergens. This project attempts to determine whether or not the food includes allergies by applying the SVM data mining method to a public dataset of food goods and allergens that was acquired via Kaggle. High accuracy, effective memory use, and the ability to handle non-normally distributed data are some of the benefits of the SVM method. Data collection is the first step in the research process. Data pre-processing, which includes data transformation, handling missing values, and copy objects, comes next. Validation comes next. Split validation with 90% training data and 10% testing data, 10-fold cross validation, and split validation with an 80%–20% ratio were all compared in this study. The SVM method is applied after the dataset has passed validation, and the confusion matrix is used for the last evaluation step. SVM has an accuracy rate of 97.24% when using 10-fold cross validation, according to the accuracy value produced by the validation process comparison. Split validation yields an accuracy value of 97.50% when the ratio of training data to testing data is 90% to 10%. In contrast, an accuracy rate of 98.75% was achieved by using split validation with a ratio of 80% and 20%.