Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review Action Research Literate (ARL)
Ardianto Iskandar, Eka
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kurator Dalam Proses Pergantian Kurator Berdasarkan Ketentuan Pasal 71 Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan PKPU Tri Saputra, Nico; Sihombing, L Alfies; Ardianto Iskandar, Eka
Action Research Literate Vol. 8 No. 5 (2024): Action Research Literate
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/arl.v8i5.366

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi kurator dalam proses pergantian kurator berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 71 Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan DAN PKPU. Tidak adanya perindungan hukum yang semestinya diterima oleh Kurator dalam melaksanakan tugas dan kewajibannya. Pergantian Kurator sebagaimana disebutkan sebelumnya berubah dari Rezky Rizal dan Emiral Rangga sebagai TIM Kurator menjadi M. Arfah, Musdalifah, Abraham yang ditunjuk untuk menggantikan Kurator yang sudah ditetapkan berdasarkan Putusan No.4/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Mks. Pergantian ini juga mengindikasikan bahwasanya bukan hanya tidak adanya bentuk perlindungan hukum yang jelas dan tegas bagi Kurator dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU, namun ketidakpastian hukum serta keadilan yang tidak memainkan perannya dikarenakan perlindungan terhadap beberapa kepentingan yang tidak mengindahkan esensi dari hukum itu sendiri yang mencoreng citra dan norma hukum yang berlaku.
DISHARMONY IN THE REGULATION OF MORTGAGE EXECUTION IN THE PROCESS OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATION SUSPENSION AND BANKRUPTCY Muhammad Sobar, Fidji; Nuraeni, Yeni; Ardianto Iskandar, Eka
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i3.2105

Abstract

Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) under Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU is designed as a legal mechanism to facilitate fair and efficient debt restructuring while preventing business collapse. PKPU grants a temporary moratorium of up to 270 days for debtors to propose a composition plan to creditors. However, a normative conflict arises between the rights of secured creditors under Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights and the provisions of the Bankruptcy/PKPU Law. Article 6 of the Mortgage Law authorizes first-ranking mortgage holders to execute collateral through auction upon debtor default, whereas Article 245 of the Bankruptcy/PKPU Law restricts debt payments, including proceeds from collateral execution, prior to the approval of a composition plan (homologation) or a declaration of bankruptcy, except on a proportional basis to all creditors. This study employs normative juridical research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to analyze the disharmony between these regulations and its implications for legal certainty. The findings indicate that the suspension of execution rights during PKPU creates uncertainty and weakens the position of secured creditors, potentially conflicting with the principle of material security rights. Therefore, regulatory harmonization is necessary to balance the protection of secured creditors’ rights with the restructuring objectives of PKPU, thereby ensuring legal certainty and fairness within Indonesia’s insolvency framework.
Co-Authors Muhammad Sobar, Fidji Sihombing, L. Alfies Tri Saputra, Nico Yeni Nuraeni, Yeni