Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Role of Probiotics in Improving Motor Function in Parkinson’s Disease: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Andra Danika; Paulus Alexander Supit
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/qbay7381

Abstract

Introduction: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor deterioration that profoundly impacts functional independence and quality of life. Recent advances suggest that the gut–brain axis contributes to PD pathophysiology, with gut dysbiosis potentially exacerbating neuroinflammation and α-synuclein pathology. Probiotics have emerged as a novel therapeutic approach, but their effect on motor outcomes remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in alleviating motor deterioration in PD, with Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS III) scores as the primary outcome. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to February 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing probiotics with placebo or usual care in adults with PD. The primary outcome was mean change in UPDRS III scores. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool, and certainty of evidence was graded with GRADE methodology. Random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: From 294 records, five RCTs comprising 317 participants met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in motor function with probiotics compared to control (MD –3.15, 95% CI –5.76 to –0.54; p = 0.02). The direction of effect consistently favored probiotics across all trials, although heterogeneity was moderate (I² = 65%). Adverse events were infrequent and mild, primarily consisting of transient gastrointestinal discomfort. No serious probiotic-related adverse events were reported. Discussion: This analysis highlights the potential role of probiotics as a safe and accessible adjunctive strategy in PD management. The magnitude of improvement in UPDRS III exceeds the minimal clinically important difference, suggesting clinically meaningful benefits. Nevertheless, variability in probiotic formulations, small sample sizes, and short treatment durations limit generalizability. Integration of microbiome profiling and biomarker assessment in future trials may clarify mechanisms of action and identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit. Conclusion: Probiotic supplementation appears to provide a modest but clinically relevant improvement in motor function in PD, as measured by UPDRS III. While promising, further large, standardized, and long-term RCTs are required before probiotics can be integrated into routine PD care.
Vitamin D Supplementation and its Effect on Modified Rankin Scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Andra Danika; Paulus Alexander Supit; Maria Stefanny Setiawan
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 18 No. 7 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/99rg7932

Abstract

Introduction: The role of vitamin D in functional recovery after acute ischemic stroke remains unclear due to inconsistent evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on functional and neurological recovery, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), in adult patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar for randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses since 2015. Eligible studies included adult ischemic stroke patients receiving vitamin D supplementation with reported mRS or NIHSS outcomes. Data were synthesized, and random-effects meta-analyses calculated pooled hazard ratios (HRs). Results: Vitamin D supplementation was associated with significant improvements in mRS (HR 1.32) and NIHSS (HR 1.30). However, substantial heterogeneity was observed (mRS I² = 78.4%; NIHSS I² = 77%). Variability largely stemmed from differences in supplementation regimens (single high-dose injection vs. daily oral) and the baseline vitamin D status of participants. Discussion: Findings suggest vitamin D may enhance post-stroke recovery, though the benefit is not consistent across populations. Improvements were most evident among patients with pre-existing deficiency, indicating supplementation may be particularly effective as corrective therapy. Variation in dosage and timing complicates the formulation of a single treatment recommendation Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation is associated with a statistically significant improvement in functional and neurological outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke, as measured by the mRS and the NIHSS. The pooled data suggests a beneficial role for vitamin D in post-stroke recovery
Mirogabalin 15 mg Twice Daily for Reduction of Average Daily Pain Score in Neuropathic Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Andra Danika; Paulus Alexander Supit
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 22 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/zz360g32

Abstract

Background: Neuropathic pain is a chronic condition that significantly impairs quality of life, causing sleep disturbance, depression, and functional disability. Standard first-line treatments such as pregabalin and gabapentin are frequently limited by insufficient efficacy or poor tolerability. Mirogabalin is a novel α2δ ligand with slower dissociation from the α2δ-1 subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels, potentially offering sustained analgesia with improved tolerability. Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin 15 mg twice daily compared with placebo in adult patients with neuropathic pain. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from database through September 2025 for double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs. The primary outcome was mean change from baseline in average daily pain score (ADPS). Secondary outcomes included ≥30% pain responder rate and treatment-emergent adverse events. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0. Results: Four RCTs with a total of 1,819 participants were included. Mirogabalin significantly reduced ADPS compared with placebo (pooled MD −0.57, 95% CI −0.73 to −0.41; p < 0.00001; I² = 0%). Pooled analysis of dichotomous outcomes demonstrated a significantly greater likelihood of achieving ≥30% pain reduction with mirogabalin (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11–1.44; p < 0.01). Most studies had low risk of bias. The most common adverse events were somnolence and dizziness, which were generally mild to moderate. Conclusions: Mirogabalin 15 mg twice daily significantly improves pain outcomes compared with placebo, both in mean ADPS reduction and responder rate, and is generally well tolerated. Although the mean pain reduction is modest, the improved responder rate suggests that a clinically meaningful proportion of patients may benefit. Further research should explore long-term efficacy, optimal dosing, and predictors of response.