Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Central Venous Disease in Hemodialysis Patients: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Pathophysiology, Management, and Outcomes Edelwis Christine; Charles Sanjaya
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 17 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/9qtn3g23

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Central Venous Disease (CVD), encompassing stenosis and occlusion of major thoracic veins, represents a critical challenge in the management of hemodialysis (HD) patients. It is a leading cause of vascular access dysfunction, contributing to significant morbidity, inadequate dialysis delivery, and compromised quality of life. This review systematically evaluates the evidence base for the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of CVD in this vulnerable population. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Semanthic Scholar, Springer, Wiley Online Library for cohort studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and systematic reviews published between 1995 and 2024. Studies were included if they evaluated risk factors or treatment outcomes for CVD in adult HD patients. Primary outcomes analyzed were technical success, clinical success, primary patency, assisted-primary patency, and secondary patency. Secondary outcomes included complication rates and re-intervention frequency. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria for detailed outcome analysis, supplemented by numerous others for epidemiological and pathophysiological context. The evidence overwhelmingly identifies prior central venous catheter (CVC) placement as the principal risk factor for CVD, with risk increasing with catheter duration and number of placements. Endovascular therapy is the first-line treatment for symptomatic lesions. Comparative analysis revealed that while percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has high initial success, it suffers from poor long-term primary patency (21-29% at 12 months). Stent grafts (SGs) demonstrate significantly superior primary patency (84-100% at 12 months) compared to both PTA and bare-metal stents (BMS). Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) show promise over PTA but require further validation in central venous anatomy. Surgical bypass remains a viable salvage option for refractory cases. DISCUSSION: The pathogenesis of CVD is a CVC-driven process of endothelial injury and neointimal hyperplasia, exacerbated by high access flow. The management paradigm has shifted from PTA-dominant strategies to a more durable, device-oriented approach, with SGs offering the best primary patency. However, high rates of re-intervention across all modalities underscore the recalcitrant nature of the disease, highlighting a critical need for preventative strategies centered on CVC avoidance. CONCLUSION: CVD is a frequent and serious complication in HD patients, primarily caused by CVCs. While endovascular interventions can effectively manage symptomatic lesions, SGs provide the most durable outcomes. The cornerstone of management should be prevention through timely creation of permanent vascular access.
Fecal Calprotectin: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Its Diagnostic and Monitoring Efficacy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Emilia Fitri Annisa; Charles Sanjaya
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 19 No. 4 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/x6r8d759

Abstract

Introduction Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), encompassing Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD), is a chronic, relapsing condition demanding continuous, objective surveillance of mucosal inflammation. Due to the burdens associated with invasive endoscopy—the conventional gold standard for assessment—there is a critical need for accurate, non-invasive biomarkers. Fecal Calprotectin (FC), a stable protein released by activated neutrophils, serves as a quantitative surrogate marker that directly correlates with the level and extent of gastrointestinal inflammation. This comprehensive systematic review aggregates high-level meta-analytic evidence to define the precise utility of FC across IBD diagnosis, therapeutic monitoring, and prediction of long-term disease course. Methods This systematic review synthesized quantitative findings from high-quality diagnostic accuracy and prognostic meta-analyses, encompassing data pooled from over fifteen primary studies focusing on adults and children with IBD. The underlying systematic searches utilized extensive database coverage, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Springer, Wiley Online Library. Key performance metrics rigorously extracted included pooled sensitivity, specificity, Area Under the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC), Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR), Positive Likelihood Ratio (PLR), and Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR). The methodological rigor of the aggregated evidence was assessed using the QUADAS-2 framework. Results FC demonstrated superior accuracy for differentiating IBD from functional gastrointestinal disorders. At the standard 50 mug/g cut-off, pooled analyses yield high sensitivity (89% to 99%) and a critically high Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 0.99 for IBD exclusion. In monitoring, FC reliably correlates with endoscopic activity, with optimal performance in UC (AUROC 0.97) but diminished utility in isolated small bowel CD (SB-CD), where the AUROC drops to 0.72 at the 100 mug/g cut-off. For prognostic assessment, the optimal pooled cut-off of 152 mug/g for predicting clinical relapse in adult UC patients in remission yields a robust DOR of 10.54. Furthermore, distinct concentration ranges define Mucosal Healing (MH) targets: 60-75 mug/g for UC (AUC 0.88) versus a higher 180-250 mug/g range for CD (AUC 0.79). Discussion FC is confirmed as an essential biomarker, yet its optimal implementation requires careful consideration of its limitations, including significant quantitative variability (up to 5-fold differences) across commercial assays, which hinders the universal application of precise meta-analytic thresholds. The physiological barrier in detecting proximal small bowel inflammation necessitates integrating FC results with cross-sectional imaging and exploring complementary serum biomarkers. The greatest clinical value of FC lies in its use for continuous, longitudinal surveillance to proactively guide therapeutic intensification and reduce the need for unnecessary endoscopic procedures. Conclusion and Recommendations Fecal Calprotectin is established as an indispensable, non-invasive biomarker for IBD triage and continuous surveillance. Its clinical efficacy is maximized through the meticulous application of phenotype- and location-specific cut-offs tailored to the specific clinical query (diagnosis, MH, or relapse prediction). Standardizing commercial FC assays remains the most crucial outstanding challenge to ensure the consistent, reliable, and interchangeable application of these evidence-based thresholds across global healthcare settings.