Januari Pratama Nurratri Trisnaningtyas
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of Manila Bay Sustainable Development Masterplan (Mbsdm) and National Capital Integrated Coastal Development (Ncicd) Program in Mitigation Strategy of Sea Level Rise in Indonesia and Philippines Najwa Belvana Balqis; Januari Pratama Nurratri Trisnaningtyas
POLITICO Vol. 24 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL POLITICO FISIPOL
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32528/politico.v24i2.3039

Abstract

This research aims to compare the implementation of two policy projects in cooperation with the Dutch government to address sea level rise in two major cities. Focusing on two projects in the two Southeast Asian capitals of Manila and Jakarta with similar geographical locations, similar problems, and similar foreign cooperation partners, but have different implementations in the two countries. This research uses the theory of Comparative Policy to analyze the comparison of the effectiveness of program implementation in both countries. The method used in data collection is through secondary data, where the author does not directly collect data but through third parties in the form of previous articles and journals. Despite the fact that both projects cooperate with the Netherlands through the Netherlands International Water Ambitions (NIWA), they have different approaches. By involving the private sector in its funding, MBSDM concentrates more on nature-based solutions such as mangrove restoration and coastal ecosystem zoning. NCICD, on the other hand, concentrates on building large infrastructure intended to prevent tidal flooding quickly, such as the Giant Sea Wall, giant dykes and coastal reclamation.
Sociopolitical Determinants of Canada’s FIAP in Post-Conflict Recovery: Jordan, Myanmar, Nigeria. Januari Pratama Nurratri Trisnaningtyas; Annisa Diah Pitaloka; Nadhea Khoirun Nabila; Azzahra Keyne Nabilla Radliyati
Indonesian Journal of Peace and Security Studies (IJPSS) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Peace and Security Studies
Publisher : Department of International Relations, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ijpss.v7i2.173

Abstract

This study examines how sociopolitical factors shape the implementation of Canada’s Feminist International Assistance Policy (FIAP) in three partner countries—Jordan, Myanmar, and Nigeria in 2020-2024. Using a comparative qualitative approach grounded in the Most Similar Systems Design (MSSD), the research explores how varying political institutions, social structures, and governance conditions influence the translation of feminist foreign policy principles into practice. Findings reveal that while FIAP’s three core pillars, Rights, Resources, and Representation, are consistently implemented, their outcomes vary significantly across contexts. In Jordan, implementation has been relatively effective due to institutional stability and state–civil society collaboration. In contrast, Myanmar’s political instability following the 2021 military coup has constrained FIAP’s reach, forcing a shift toward localized and community-level empowerment initiatives. Meanwhile, Nigeria demonstrates a hybrid outcome, where grassroots engagement and strong civil society networks have driven progress in women’s economic participation and local governance, despite enduring structural inequalities. The study concludes that the effectiveness of FIAP depends not only on program design but also on the compatibility between feminist policy frameworks and the sociopolitical realities of recipient countries, highlighting the importance of contextual sensitivity in advancing global gender equality agendas.