Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Hasil Perbandingan Sistem Pemerintahan Menurut UUD 1945 Dengan Hasil Perubahan Setelah Amandemen Anthony Sutedja; Wilma Silalahi
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 2 Nomor 2 June - September
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v3i2.147

Abstract

The system of government is an essential element in the continuity and existence of a state. Every country inevitably has its own system of government, which may differ from that of other nations. The freedom to determine a system of government must not involve interference or intervention from other countries, as each state has the right to establish and implement its own system. In Indonesia, the administration of government since independence has undergone several changes up to the present day. These changes are referred to as amendments. The amendments to the Constitution concerning the system of government were carried out four times, between 1999 and 2002. These changes were based on government policies and, once again, were not the result of coercion, demands, or pressure from other countries. Rather, they were undertaken by the Indonesian government to ensure the continuity of the state, safeguard national sovereignty, and, most importantly, to promote the welfare of the Indonesian people. In the process of altering a system of government, debates and differing opinions inevitably arise. Therefore, deliberation and public consultation are necessary. The government must carefully evaluate and analyze the inputs from the people before making decisions and implementing them in Indonesia. The government, in principle, does not enact changes or policies solely on its own will without considering public opinion, except in urgent circumstances that require immediate action. Fundamentally, Indonesia adheres to a democratic system of government, in which democracy is defined as a form of governance where the highest authority resides in the hands of the people.
Mewujudkan Kedaulatan Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Nasional melalui Kesadaran Pajak Masyarakat Wilma Silalahi; Anthony Sutedja
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Pendidikan, Volume 3 Nomor 2, September-Desember 2025
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/jpcp.v3i2.194

Abstract

Tax is a form of revenue for a country and plays a very important role in maintaining the sustainability of the state. The definition of tax is a mandatory contribution paid by citizens to the government, which is coercive in nature and regulated by prevailing laws, without direct compensation, and is used to finance government expenditures for the benefit and welfare of the people within the country. In practice, however, various issues related to taxation still frequently occur, including its implementation, objectives, and system. One of the major problems faced today is the misuse of authority by certain government officials, where tax revenues that should be allocated to national development and public welfare are instead used for personal or familial enrichment.Another issue in the implementation of taxation in Indonesia is the lack of education and understanding among many citizens—especially those from lower-income groups—regarding the importance and benefits of paying taxes, as well as how the taxation system in Indonesia actually works. Therefore, it is essential to establish comprehensive education and socialization programs on taxation for all levels of society in Indonesia. The purpose of these efforts is to build economic sovereignty and national development through public awareness and participation, which should not only be the responsibility of government officials but also involve the active role of every citizen in supporting the implementation of taxation in Indonesia.
HKI sebagai Aset Pembiayaan: Kajian Hukum, Mekanisme, dan Tantangan Implementasinya di Indonesia: Penelitian Urbanisasi; Anthony Sutedja
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 2 (October 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i2.3710

Abstract

Intellectual Property (IP) is currently recognized as one of the valuable assets that can be owned by individuals and business entities. According to the classification of assets regulated in the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), Book II, Chapter I, Article 499, it is stated that “under the law, an object is defined as any good and any right that can be owned.” Intellectual Property falls into the category of intangible assets, as it represents non-physical rights that carry economic value and ownership potential. However, for IP to be legally recognized as the property of an individual or a business entity, it must be formally registered with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DJKI). Once the registration process is completed, the owner will be granted an official certificate of ownership, providing legal protection and recognition of their intellectual rights. Alongside the rapid growth of business and the creative economy, Intellectual Property no longer serves merely as a form of protection for intellectual works but has evolved into a high-value economic asset that can be leveraged in various financial activities. One innovative approach to utilizing IP is its use as collateral for bank loans. This concept offers a new alternative for entrepreneurs, particularly those in the creative industries, who often face difficulties in accessing credit due to the lack of conventional collateral such as land or buildings. With legal recognition of IP’s economic value, financial institutions can assess and accept these rights as loan guarantees, thereby expanding access to financing for innovators and creative entrepreneurs.The implementation of IP as banking collateral aligns with the government’s efforts to strengthen the creative economy and foster innovation-driven growth in Indonesia. Nevertheless, several challenges remain, including the valuation mechanism of IP assets, legal protection of pledged rights, and the readiness of financial institutions to assess the associated risks and validity. Therefore, effective collaboration among the government, financial institutions, and IP owners is essential to establish transparent regulations and valuation systems. Such cooperation will enable the use of IP as loan collateral to function efficiently and sustainably, contributing to national economic development.