Kholifatul Muna
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Urgensi Pengaturan Presidential Ethics Sebagai Penguatan Sistem Presidensial Dalam Undang-Undang Lembaga Kepresidenan Aditya Andela Pratama; Kholifatul Muna
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 5 SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Ethics play an important role in the process of statehood, ethics are also a barrier as well as a constitutional step in strengthening the presidential system. The absence of specific regulations on presidential ethics in Indonesia's positive legal framework will have an impact on the absence of ethical standards in state practice and legal vacuums that have the potential to create ambiguity in the president's standards of behavior in carrying out his functions and authority, both in the formal scope of the state and in broader political interactions. This research aims to examine in depth the importance of presidential ethics regulation and its relationship in strengthening the presidential system of government. The method used is normative juridical with Statute Approach, Conceptual Approach and Philosophical Approach. The results of this study show that the regulation of presidential ethics is very necessary, considering the increasingly complex ethical challenges faced by state leaders in modern political dynamics. The design of the presidential ethics regulation in the Law on Presidential Institutions needs to include three main aspects: ethics in the administration of government, personal ethics of the President, and ethics in public communication. This arrangement is important to ensure that the President exercises power ethically, transparently, and accountably. With clear regulations, it is hoped that it can strengthen the presidential system of government and prevent abuse of power.
Indonesia's Accountability as a State That Did Not Ratify the 1951 Refugee Convention on the Rohingya Ethnic Group in the Perspective of International Human Rights Ahmad Lukman Hadi; Kholifatul Muna; Fanisa Mayda Ayiliani
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.6680

Abstract

of Rohingya ethnic refugees who come to Indonesia where Indonesia has not ratified the 1951 Refugee Convention so that it poses its own challenges in dealing with Rohingya refugees, so human rights aspects and various moral and empathetic efforts are still needed. The study uses a normative legal approach to analyze legal frameworks relevant to the Rohingya ethnic situation, highlighting the human rights protections provided by international legal instruments such as the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The ongoing conflict in Myanmar shows the allegations/assumptions of systematic human rights violations, showing the need for joint action in upholding human rights principles. Although Indonesia has not ratified the 1951 Refugee Convention, the state has a moral and legal obligation to respect human rights, including in addressing the problem of the arrival of the Rohingya in terms of seeking asylum and shelter. The protection of refugees, including the Rohingya, is a fundamental moral and legal responsibility of the international community, which includes the Indonesian government. The Indonesian government has also taken steps to provide protection to refugees, including working with UNHCR in finding solutions for Rohingya refugees in Aceh. In the absence of Indonesia ratifying the refugee convention, moral and legal efforts are still needed to ensure proper protection for Rohingya refugees and uphold human rights principles at the international level.