Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal Law and Legal Ethics (IJLLE)
M susilo agung saputro, Agung
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Juridical Analysis Of The Reasons For The Annulment Of International Arbitration Awards By The Supreme Court In Decision No. 219 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2016 M susilo agung saputro, Agung; Lauren B. Edelman
International Journal of Law and Legal Ethics Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Vol 6 Issue 1 April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47701/ijlle.v6i1.4851

Abstract

There are often obstacles in the recognition and enforcement of international arbitration awards, particularly concerning annulment grounds submitted to the Supreme Court, such as procedural non-compliance, allegations of fraud, and inconsistencies with the arbitration agreement, which may affect confidence in arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism. This study aims to explore the mechanisms, challenges, and implications of annulment, as well as comprehensively examine the legal foundations underlying decisions and their impact on the parties' trust in arbitration. The research employs a normative juridical approach, with the results analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia plays a crucial role in annulling international arbitration awards based on national law and the principles of justice, especially in cases involving procedural violations or conflicts with public interest. The Supreme Court's rulings in international arbitration cases have significant legal implications, including clarifying the requirements for arbitration award recognition, enhancing legal certainty for investors, and strengthening Indonesia's legal standing in international agreements. While Supreme Court decisions may reinforce the arbitration system, diverse perspectives exist among stakeholders—business actors and investors may be concerned about legal uncertainty, whereas regulators and legal practitioners view such rulings as essential for maintaining arbitration integrity. Therefore, consistency, transparency, and the strengthening of arbitration regulations are key factors in sustaining trust in Indonesia's arbitration system.
Co-Authors Lauren B. Edelman