Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Pragmatic Analysis of Women and Angry Speech: Case Study of The Saudi Arabian Takki Series Farafishah, Nailah; Haeruddin, Haeruddin; Ramadhan, Ilham; Ahmad, Muhammad Anwar
Alsina : Journal of Arabic Studies Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/alsina.7.2.27839

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the forms of illocutionary acts and impoliteness strategies in anger utterances directed at women in the Saudi Arabian series Takki. In Arab culture, angry utterances are not merely emotional expressions but serve as tools for enforcing social norms and patriarchal control. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method with a pragmatic approach. The data, consisting of dialogue excerpts, were analyzed using Searle's speech act theory and Culpeper's theory of impoliteness. The results show that anger utterances in Takki are dominated by directive, expressive, commissive, and declarative acts, accompanied by impoliteness strategies, including insults, prohibitions, threats, and verbal abuse. These utterances reflect unequal power relations between men and women and reinforce patriarchal structures in Saudi society. This study confirms that language functions as a significant tool of social control in cultures where family honor is paramount. By uncovering the pragmatic mechanisms that sustain gendered communication hierarchies, this research contributes to the broader understanding of how linguistic behavior reinforces social ideologies within both pragmatic and sociocultural theoretical frameworks.
PENYALAHGUNAAN KEWENANGAN PEJABAT PUBLIK DALAM PENANGGULANGAN JUDI ONLINE SEBAGAI SUAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Aini, Nur; Farafishah, Nailah; Rizkiah, Nurfatiha
Legislatif VOLUME 9 NOMOR 1 2025
Publisher : UKM Lembaga Penalaran dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanuddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The abuse of authority by public officials in addressing online gambling reveals weaknesses in the integrity and accountability system of state apparatus. The Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs (Komdigi), which is normatively authorized to block gambling websites, was instead involved in practices protecting illegal sites in exchange for certain benefits. This study aims to analyze the forms of such abuse of authority and to demonstrate that the conduct of public officials in this case fulfills the elements of bribery in office as regulated under the Anti-Corruption Law, which are not reflected in the application of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. This research employs normative legal research using a statutory approach to comprehensively examine the provisions of Article 12 letter (a), as well as a conceptual approach to assess the qualification of receiving gifts or promises due to official position as an offense of office under corruption law. The findings indicate that the actions of public officials who allowed certain online gambling sites to continue operating while receiving financial benefits satisfy the elements of Article 12 letter (a) of Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption. The conclusion emphasizes that the conduct of Komdigi officials should not be regarded as a technical violation of the EIT Law, but rather as a corruption offense characterized by abuse of authority based on official position, thereby placing it within the corruption law regime as the basis for public officials’ criminal liability.