Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora HUMANIORASAINS
Selvira Paulina Ananda
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kontrak Sosial Robek: Analisis Sosiologi Hukum Saat Negara Gagal Berdialog, Demonstrasi Jalanan Agustus 2025 Menjadi Mahkamah Terakhir Selvira Paulina Ananda; Indra Jaya; Indryani, Indryani; Ari Tridianto; Anak Agung Dewi Intan Parwati; Mardiman Sane; Robert L Simanungkalit
JISPENDIORA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Pendidikan Dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Desember: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora
Publisher : Badan Penerbit STIEPARI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56910/jispendiora.v3i3.3360

Abstract

This study examines the massive demonstrations on August 25-29, 2025, as a manifestation of the disintegration of the social contract between the people and the state. These actions stemmed from deep disappointment with the House of Representatives (DPR), sparked by the issue of allowance increases and the arrogance of council members. Using a socio-legal approach, this study argues that the demonstrations signaled a breakdown in the political and moral legitimacy of the people's representatives, where the law was no longer obeyed out of conviction, but rather out of coercion. Key findings indicate that the DPR's non-participatory legislative function, exacerbated by systemic abuse of power to serve oligarchic interests, has significantly eroded public trust. Although the quantity of DPR legislation in the 2019-2024 period increased, its quality is questionable due to the practice of "fast-track" legislation and the low completion of the National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) targets. Comparative analysis reveals a recurring pattern of protests against flawed legislation. However, the 2025 demonstrations saw a new escalation after a tragic incident that killed a protester, shifting the focus of public anger from policy issues to alleged human rights violations by the authorities. This study concludes that the restoration of trust can only be achieved through a more participatory and transparent reconstruction of the social contract, as well as firm law enforcement against individuals who betray the public mandate.
HARMONISASI REGULASI PENGELOLAAN RUMAH SUSUN: MITIGASI KONFLIK PENAGIHAN IPL MELALUI PENDEKATAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DAN HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Robert L Simanungkalit; Parsaoran Situmorang; Selvira Paulina Ananda; Jopie Tommy Rompas; Ruby W H Oktolina Samosir
Jurnal Humaniora dan Sosial Sains Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pojok Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Conflicts between the Management Board and apartment unit owners regarding the collection of Environmental Management Fees (IPL) often create prolonged social and legal tensions. This study aims to analyze the legitimacy of these actions through the lens of the Consumer Protection Law, contract law, and criminal law using normative juridical research methods. This study analyzes the urgency of harmonizing regulations on apartment management by integrating the principles of Restorative Justice and the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK). Through normative juridical research methods, it was found that unilateral termination is a form of abuse of power relations that violates Article 18 of the UUPK and consumer human rights. The study shows that unilateral termination is a form of abuse of power relations that violates basic consumer rights and contradicts the principle of propriety, so that the clause in the House Rules that legitimizes this practice is declared null and void. As a mitigation solution, this study offers a Restorative Justice paradigm that prioritizes dialogue and relationship restoration to avoid the practice of vigilantism or eigenrichting which carries criminal risks. This study offers a new paradigm in conflict resolution through penal mediation (restorative justice) and a relationship restoration approach, to avoid the practice of vigilantism (eigenrichting). The results of the study recommend the need for policy reform that prioritizes dialogue and proportional sanctions to create harmony in life in flats.
Co-Authors Anak Agung Dewi Intan Parwati Ari Tridianto Indra Jaya Indryani, Indryani Jopie Tommy Rompas Mardiman Sane Parsaoran Situmorang Robert L Simanungkalit Ruby W H Oktolina Samosir