Ningsih, Sherly Tricia
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Peraturan Kesehatan Internasional dan Strategi Ekonomi : Komitmen Indonesia dalam International Health Regulations (IHR) Ningsih, Sherly Tricia
Indonesian Perspective Vol 10, No 1 (2025): (Januari-Juni 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v10i1.72446

Abstract

In May 2005, the 58th World Health Assembly adopted the International Health Regulations (IHR) to enhance global responses to public health threats by strengthening state capacities while minimizing disruptions to international travel and trade. Member states are required to report their ability to detect, assess, and respond to global health threats and allocate sufficient budgets to support national health systems. Indonesia committed to implementing the IHR in June 2007, targeting full implementation by 2014 despite challenges in its domestic health sector. This study explores Indonesia’s commitment to implementing the IHR (2005) using Robert O. Keohane’s neoliberal institutionalism approach, which emphasizes the role of international institutions in shaping state behavior through cooperative rules to achieve mutual benefits. Employing a qualitative approach and literature review, it analyzes secondary data from government documents, international reports, and prior research. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s commitment was driven by humanitarian, political, and economic considerations, aiming to balance domestic and international health policies while strengthening its health system to address global challenges. 
Peraturan Kesehatan Internasional dan Strategi Ekonomi : Komitmen Indonesia dalam International Health Regulations (IHR) Ningsih, Sherly Tricia
Indonesian Perspective Vol 10, No 1 (2025): (Januari-Juni 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v10i1.72446

Abstract

In May 2005, the 58th World Health Assembly adopted the International Health Regulations (IHR) to enhance global responses to public health threats by strengthening state capacities while minimizing disruptions to international travel and trade. Member states are required to report their ability to detect, assess, and respond to global health threats and allocate sufficient budgets to support national health systems. Indonesia committed to implementing the IHR in June 2007, targeting full implementation by 2014 despite challenges in its domestic health sector. This study explores Indonesia’s commitment to implementing the IHR (2005) using Robert O. Keohane’s neoliberal institutionalism approach, which emphasizes the role of international institutions in shaping state behavior through cooperative rules to achieve mutual benefits. Employing a qualitative approach and literature review, it analyzes secondary data from government documents, international reports, and prior research. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s commitment was driven by humanitarian, political, and economic considerations, aiming to balance domestic and international health policies while strengthening its health system to address global challenges. 
Challenging Universalism: Contesting Global Gender Equality through Uang Japuik Ningsih, Sherly Tricia
Nation State: Journal of International Studies Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Norm Contestation, Identity and Cultural Dynamics in Contemporary International
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of International Relations, Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/nsjis.v8i2.2303

Abstract

This article investigates the Minangkabau matrilineal practice of uang japuik as a site of contestation against universalist international gender norms. Through a qualitative approach combining a literature review with discourse analysis of legal and cultural texts, this study employs norm contestation theory and postcolonial feminism to unpack the tensions between global values and local meanings. Findings show that uang japuik, a payment from the bride's family to the groom's, defies reduction to female commodification. Locally, it functions as a symbol of respect, reciprocity, and kinship, representing a distinct matrilineal logic of gender equality. The practice constitutes an epistemic resistance against global narratives that monolithically condemn marriage payments without cultural context. Ultimately, this research argues that the diffusion of international norms is a complex arena of negotiation, demanding a more pluralistic and culturally sensitive approach to the diverse pathways of women's emancipation in the Global South.
Norm Contestation and Regional Governance: The Politics of Social Security Portability in ASEAN Ningsih, Sherly Tricia; Sundrijo, Dwi Ardhanariswari
Journal of Transformative Governance and Social Justice Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): January, 2026
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/j-tragos.v4i1.16301

Abstract

This article analyzes the dynamics of conflicting norms regarding the portability of social security for migrant workers in ASEAN, particularly the political tensions between sending and receiving countries. In line with global norms, sending countries such as Indonesia and the Philippines promote portability as a fundamental right for migrant workers. Conversely, receiving countries such as Singapore and Malaysia are more cautious, viewing it as a labor issue, not a fundamental right. The research aims to analyze how these divergent interpretations shape ASEAN’s regional governance of migrant protection and to identify the underlying political and normative factors that influence the process of regionalization. Using Antje Wiener's theory of norm contestation, this study, through qualitative methods, demonstrates the gap between global expectations and normative practices in ASEAN. The findings reveal a persistent gap between global expectations and ASEAN’s normative practices. While ASEAN has made progress in formalizing cooperation, the implementation remains fragmented and state-driven, reflecting competing interests between economic pragmatism and human rights advocacy. In conclusion, the regionalization of social security is not simply a matter of applying international standards to a regional region, but rather a political negotiation shaped by competing state interests.