Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi
Satria Wahyudi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kewenangan Hakim Tunggal dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata Sederhana Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Satria Wahyudi
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi September 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i9.984

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and evaluate comprehensively the authority of single judges in examining simple civil cases based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015. This study employs normative legal research methods with statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach to examine vague norms and potential norm conflicts in single judge judicial authority regulation. Primary legal materials include relevant legislation, particularly Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015 and its amendments, while secondary materials comprise academic literature and scientific journals discussing theoretical and practical aspects of simple court systems. The research results indicate that the juridical construction of single judge authority is built on hierarchical legal foundations starting from the 1945 Constitution to Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, with Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2015 serving as lex specialis regulating simple claim procedures with maximum material value of Rp. 200,000,000. Implementation of single judge authority faces various complex challenges including workload issues, competency constraints, and the need for adequate infrastructure support. Harmonization analysis reveals potential norm conflicts requiring systematic interpretation and comprehensive juridical solutions. This research contributes to enriching civil procedural law scholarship and provides practical references for legal practitioners and policymakers in optimizing simple claim systems to enhance justice access for society.
BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST CONSUMERS IN CREDIT-BASED HOME PURCHASES AT DR HOUSING COMPLEX, BUKITTINGGI CITY Satria Wahyudi
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18821309

Abstract

This study discusses breach of contract against consumers in purchasing houses on credit at Housing Complex in Bukittinggi City. The purpose of this study is to identify the consequences of breach of contract experienced by consumers and the legal protection provided to the aggrieved consumers. This research uses an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach, involving primary data from observations and interviews, as well as secondary data from legal literature and legislation. The results show that breaches such as delays in house handover and discrepancies in specifications cause both material and immaterial losses for consumers. Informal additional agreements that are not made formally and do not involve official developer parties weaken the consumers’ legal position. Legal protection regulated under the Civil Code and Law Number 8 Year 1999 on Consumer Protection has not been optimally implemented due to consumers’ lack of understanding, informal agreements, and complicated bureaucracy. The study recommends the necessity of formal agreements, increased supervision, legal education, and simplification of dispute resolution processes to strengthen legal protection for consumers of houses purchased on credit.
Co-Authors