Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Fadhli, Rama
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Hadith Controversy About Music (Study of Ibn Ḥazm and al-Mubārakfūrī’s Understanding) Fadhli, Rama
Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i1.21

Abstract

Recently, scholars have been discussing a range of issues, including differences of opinion on the law concerning music consumption. This research aims to determine Ibn Ḥazm and al-Mubarakfuri's understanding of music through qualitative methods with descriptive-comparative data analysis techniques. The research findings indicate that Ibn Ḥazm challenges the hadith relied upon by scholars to prohibit music as weak, including those found in the works of al-Bukhārī. According to Ibn Ḥazm, the permissibility of music depends on whether it involves any immorality. On the other hand, al-Mubārakfūrī asserts that music is unequivocally forbidden, although he occasionally permits it under certain circumstances. It is important to note that the differences of opinion among scholars on this issue do not allow for personal preference based on the arguments of each side, as there is a hadith that nullifies one of the positions. In one case, Ibn Ḥazm’s assertion regarding a weak hadith was later confirmed to be authentic, as agreed upon by scholars. Al-Mubārakfūrī maintains that music and musical instruments are impermissible without exception, despite his occasional permission for them.
Studi Komparatif Pemikiran Paulo Freire dan Ki Hajar Dewantara dalam Konteks Pendidikan Kritis Fadhli, Rama
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i2.42

Abstract

Education as an instrument of social transformation has been the focus of attention of many thinkers, including Paulo Freire and Ki Hajar Dewantara who have had a major influence in the development of critical education. The background of this study departs from the urgency of building an education system that is able to free students from structural and cultural domination that shackles their human potential. This study aims to comparatively examine the thoughts of Paulo Freire and Ki Hajar Dewantara in the context of critical education, by highlighting the similarities and differences between the two in terms of educational goals, the roles of teachers and students, and the pedagogical approaches used. The research method used is a qualitative study with a library approach, reviewing the primary and secondary works of both figures as well as a critical analysis of contemporary critical education theory. The results show that Paulo Freire emphasizes education as a praxis of liberation through horizontal dialogue, critical awareness (conscientization), and the destruction of the banking-style education model. Meanwhile, Ki Hajar Dewantara emphasizes the importance of contextual education and rooted in the nation’s cultural values, with the principle of “ing ngarso sung tulodo, ing madyo mangun karso, tut wuri handayani” as an educational leadership strategy. Both reject authoritarian approaches and position students as active subjects in the learning process. The conclusion of this study suggests that integrating Freire’s and Dewantara’s ideas can enrich critical education discourse in Indonesia, particularly in developing a dialogical, contextual, and transformative curriculum model.
Co-Authors