Dwiandi Susilo
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

External Validation of the RASH Score in Surgically Managed Acute Subdural Hematoma: A Critical Appraisal of Prognostic Accuracy and Surgical Factors in a Southeast Asian Cohort Irwansyah; Trijoso Permono; Dwiandi Susilo; Erial Bahar
Sriwijaya Journal of Surgery Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Sriwijaya Journal of Surgery
Publisher : Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/sjs.v8i2.134

Abstract

Introduction: Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is a lethal form of traumatic brain injury (TBI) with high mortality. The Richmond Acute Subdural Hematoma (RASH) score is a simple prognostic tool, but its validity in diverse populations is untested. This study aimed to perform the first external validation of the RASH score in an Indonesian cohort and critically appraise its performance alongside key surgical factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, diagnostic accuracy study of 67 adult patients who underwent surgery for traumatic ASDH between January 2022 and December 2024 at a tertiary neurosurgical center in Palembang, Indonesia. The RASH score was calculated from admission data. We additionally analyzed the type of surgery (craniotomy vs. decompressive craniectomy) and time from injury to operation. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the RASH score's predictive performance. Results: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 20.9% (n=14). The RASH score demonstrated excellent discrimination for mortality, with an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 0.824 (95% CI: 0.715–0.933; p<0.001). A score of 5 or greater was identified as the optimal cut-off, yielding a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 77.4%. This threshold provided a high Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 93.2% but a modest Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 47.8%. In bivariate analysis, decompressive craniectomy and longer time to surgery were significantly associated with mortality. Conclusion: The RASH score is a simple and robust tool for risk stratification in this selected surgical population. Its high NPV is valuable for identifying patients with a higher likelihood of survival. However, its utility must be interpreted cautiously due to the significant selection bias inherent in studying only operable patients. The score should serve as an adjunct to, not a replacement for, comprehensive clinical judgment.
Antifibrinolytic Therapy in Neurosurgical Oncology: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid for Hypervascular Intracranial Meningiomas Dwiandi Susilo
Sriwijaya Journal of Surgery Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Sriwijaya Journal of Surgery
Publisher : Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/sjs.v8i2.139

Abstract

Introduction: Resection of hypervascular intracranial meningiomas is frequently complicated by significant intraoperative hemorrhage, increasing patient morbidity and transfusion requirements. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, has shown promise in other surgical fields, but high-level evidence in intracranial tumor surgery is lacking. This study aimed to rigorously evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative TXA in reducing blood loss during craniotomy for convexity and spheno-orbital meningiomas. Methods: This single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 30 adult female patients scheduled for elective resection of convexity or spheno-orbital meningiomas. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous TXA (15 mg/kg bolus followed by a 1 mg/kg/hr infusion) or a matching saline placebo. The primary outcome was total intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, perioperative changes in hematological and coagulation parameters, and the incidence of thromboembolic events within 30 days. Results: The TXA group (n=15) and the placebo group (n=15) were well-matched at baseline. Mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the TXA group compared to the placebo group (765.0 ± 94.39 mL vs. 1010.0 ± 131.20 mL; mean difference, -245 mL; 95% CI, -444.2 to -45.8; p = 0.019; Cohen's d = 2.15). The TXA group exhibited a significantly smaller postoperative drop in hemoglobin (-0.97 g/dL vs. -2.36 g/dL; p = 0.041) and significantly lower D-dimer levels at 24 hours (850 ± 210 ng/mL vs. 1620 ± 450 ng/mL; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in PRBC transfusion volume (p = 0.410). No thromboembolic events were recorded in either group. Conclusion: In patients undergoing resection of hypervascular convexity and spheno-orbital meningiomas, perioperative TXA administration significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss and preserves postoperative hemoglobin. The agent demonstrated a favorable safety profile with no observed increase in thromboembolic risk in this cohort