Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Matakao Corruption Law Review
Wirabuana, Zainuddin
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kewenangan Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Dalam Menyatakan Kerugian Keuangan Wirabuana, Zainuddin; Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen; Bakarbessy, Andress Deny
MATAKAO Corruption Law Review Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Mei 2023 MATAKAO Corruption Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Korupsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/matakao.v1i1.9054

Abstract

Introduction: The Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) is an internal supervisor who carries out the task of administering government affairs in the field of state/regional financial supervision and national development. Law enforcement officials often use the results of the APIP audit as evidence in trials of corruption cases, as well as the panel of judges at the Ambon District Court continues to accept the results of calculations and provide expert opinions in trials. Purposes of the Research: Analyzing juridically through reviewing laws and regulations relating to the authority of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus in declaring state financial losses, and analyzing the relationship between supervisory and auditing institutions (BPK and APIP) in determining and declaring state financial losses. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative, that is, research that primarily examines positive legal provisions and legal principles, explain and predicts in the direcrion of future legal developments. Results of the Research: The results of the research show that (1) APIP remains authorized to conduct investigative audits, audit calculations of state financial losses and provide expert testimony at trial, (2) There is no legal protection that regulates the pattern of confidential audit results relations between APIP and BPK. Therefore, it is necessary to enact laws and regulations that reinforce the role of each supervisory and examiner institution to create legal certainty and prevent overlapping authorities.
Kewenangan Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Dalam Menyatakan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Wirabuana, Zainuddin; Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen; Bakarbessy, Andress Deny
MATAKAO Corruption Law Review Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Mei 2024 MATAKAO Corruption Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Korupsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/matakao.v2i1.13517

Abstract

Introduction: The Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) is an internal supervisor who carries out the task of administering government affairs in the field of state/regional financial supervision and national development. Law enforcement officials often use the results of the APIP audit as evidence in trials of corruption cases, as well as the panel of judges at the Ambon District Court continues to accept the results of calculations and provide expert opinions in trials. Purposes of the Research: Research methods with the aim of analyzing juridically through reviewing laws and regulations related to the authority of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus in declaring state financial losses, and analyzing the relationship between supervisory and auditing institutions (BPK and APIP) in determining and declaring state financial losses Methods of the Research: The writing of this thesis uses normative legal Results of the Research: The results of the research show that (1) APIP remains authorized to conduct investigative audits, audit calculations of state financial losses and provide expert testimony at trial, (2) There is no legal protection that regulates the pattern of confidential audit results relations between APIP and BPK. Therefore, it is necessary to enact laws and regulations that reinforce the role of each supervisory and examiner institution to create legal certainty and prevent overlapping authorities.
Co-Authors Bakarbessy, Andress Deny Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen