Jannah, Dara Raihatul
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Call For Respect: Analyzing Quran Burning, Human Rights, and The Islamic Law Perspective Kadir, M. Yakub Aiyub; Jannah, Dara Raihatul; Listriani, Sophia; Kurniasari, Eka; Farsia, Lena; Roesa, Nellyana
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.5271

Abstract

The burning of the Quran, widely regarded as the holy book of Islam, has sparked significant outrage and debate across various European Union states, particularly in Sweden. This provocative act raises critical questions about the balance between individual freedom of expression and the respect for religious beliefs. The European Union, through its commitment to democratic principles, often upholds freedom of expression as a fundamental right. However, this raises the issue of whether such expressions can rightfully include acts that are deeply offensive to large segments of the population, particularly religious communities. This paper explores these tensions within the framework of the development of the international human rights system, providing a nuanced analysis of responses from Muslim scholars, organizations, and associated states. It also scrutinizes the impact of Western human rights paradigms on global practices, specifically in contexts such as Indonesia. This paper found a fundamental crisis of western based of human rights and the lack of sound argument from muslim world to contribute to this lacking.
THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT'S (ICC) JURISDICTION OVER ISRAEL'S BLOCKADE ON THE GAZA STRIP: EXAMINING THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION Jannah, Dara Raihatul; Mahfud, Mahfud
Student Journal of International Law Vol 3, No 2: December 2023
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/sjil.v3i2.29557

Abstract

This paper thoroughly examines the crime of aggression in the form of the blockade of the Gaza Strip imposed by Israel and the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over this matter, despite Israel not being a state party to the Rome Statute. The research conducted is based on normative judicial research, utilizing primary and secondary legal resources. The findings of this research highlight the significant impact of the blockade on the Gaza Strip and Israel's violation of Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute, which specifically pertains to the crime of aggression. Israel's actions can be unequivocally categorized as a crime of aggression, as they fulfill the elements outlined in the article defining this crime. It is important to note that the ICC retains jurisdiction over the crime of aggression, even in cases involving non-member states like Israel, through UN Security Council referrals. In light of this, it is imperative for the ICC to take proactive action and prosecute Israel for this crime, serving as the last resort for global justice seekers.