Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Harmoni Sosial : Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Solidaritas Masyarakat LOIS: Jurnal Hukum dan Humaniora RETORIKA: Journal of Law, Social, and Humanities
Tata Eliestiana Dyah A
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Edukasi Hukum Digital sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Media Sosial di Kalangan Mahasiswa Universitas Teknologi Mataram (UTM) Jamaludin; Tata Eliestiana Dyah A
Harmoni Sosial : Jurnal Pengabdian dan Solidaritas Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Oktober: Harmoni Sosial : Jurnal Pengabdian dan Solidaritas Masyarakat
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/harmoni.v2i4.2077

Abstract

The misuse of social media in Indonesia has become an increasingly concerning issue, particularly among teenagers and university students who lack awareness of the legal consequences of digital activities. Students at Universitas Teknologi Mataram (UTM), as active social media users, are vulnerable to committing violations, whether consciously or unconsciously, due to limited understanding of the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (UU ITE). To address this, digital law literacy is necessary to help students become more aware of existing legal boundaries and to encourage them to use social media as a positive tool for self-development and academic purposes. This community service program was designed to provide digital law education as a preventive measure against social media misuse among students. The methods employed included interactive socialization through lectures, discussions, case studies, and the distribution of legal literacy materials such as leaflets and infographics. The results showed an improvement in students’ understanding of the importance of ethics, legal compliance, and the risks of digital misconduct, including hate speech, hoax dissemination, and other online violations. The program also introduced the latest provisions of Law No. 1 of 2024 concerning the amendment of Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE). Overall, this activity highlights the importance of continuous digital law education to encourage UTM students to be wiser, more critical, and responsible in their use of social media.
NORMATIVE STUDY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OF CAPITAL MARKET CRIMES IN THE INDONESIAN LEGAL SYSTEM JAMALUDIN; TATA ELIESTIANA DYAH A
LOIS: Jurnal Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 1 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Aksara Cendikia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to identify the qualifications of capital market criminal acts and analyze their legal enforcement within the framework of the Indonesian legal system. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The research results show that: 1) The qualification of criminal acts in the Capital Markets Law includes three main forms, namely criminal acts of fraud, market manipulation and insider trading. These three types of criminal acts have special characteristics because they focus on the misuse of strategic information, not on material objects, so the process of proof requires in-depth precision because the formulation of the offense is still abstract and not fully in line with the development of capital market crime modes which are increasingly complex and technology-based. 2) Law enforcement in the Indonesian capital markets sector still faces various obstacles, both from authority and technical aspects. Even though OJK has Polri and PPNS investigators, the effectiveness of investigations is still limited due to dependence on the KUHAP mechanism, inadequate technical capabilities of investigators, and sub-optimal inter-agency coordination. This condition makes case handling less responsive, so it is necessary to strengthen regulations and institutional capacity
Komentar Netizen Menjadi Hakim: Krisis Objektivitas Penegakan Hukum Pidana Akibat Dominasi Opini Publik Jamaludin, Jamaludin; Tata Eliestiana Dyah A
RETORIKA: Journal of Law, Social, and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Retorika: Journal of Law, Social, and Humanities
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69503/retorika.v4i2.1547

Abstract

Abstract The development of information technology and social media has driven the dominance of digital public opinion in criminal law enforcement in Indonesia, including the practice of trial by netizens, which has the potential to shift the objectivity, independence, and rationality of the justice system. This study aims to analyze the extent to which the dominance of public opinion shifts the objectivity of criminal law enforcement and how the phenomenon of trial by netizens triggers a crisis of objectivity in the criminal justice system. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The types and sources of legal materials are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The legal material collection technique is carried out through literature studies and analyzed qualitatively using legal reasoning and interpretation methods. The research results show that the dominance of public opinion in mass and social media has the potential to shift the objectivity of criminal law enforcement, because massive public pressure encourages law enforcement to be more responsive to social demands than to the principles of legality, presumption of innocence, and legal proof, thus risking weakening due process, judicial independence, and the objectives of the New Criminal Code for sentencing, which emphasize justice and human dignity. The phenomenon of trial by netizens shows that the digital space has transformed into an arena for social judgment that precedes the formal judicial process. Public opinion that goes viral on social media has the potential to suppress the objectivity of law enforcement, influence the decisions of law enforcement officers, and reduce the independence of judges. This condition also risks weakening the principles of due process of law and the protection of human rights, thus presenting a crisis of objectivity in the criminal justice system. Keywords: Netizen Comments; Judges; Objectivity Crisis; Criminal Law Enforcement; Public Opinion Dominance
Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Rangka Memberikan Kepastian Hukum di Indonesia Burhanudin; Tata Eliestiana Dyah A
RETORIKA: Journal of Law, Social, and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Retorika: Journal of Law, Social, and Humanities
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69503/retorika.v4i1.1549

Abstract

The advancement of a knowledge-based economy positions intellectual property rights as an important legal instrument for fostering innovation and safeguarding creative works. Nevertheless, the plurality of intellectual property regulations continues to generate issues related to normative consistency and legal certainty. This study aims to examine the consistency of legal norms governing intellectual property protection and to evaluate the fulfillment of the principle of legal certainty within Indonesia’s legal regulatory system. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal analysis is carried out through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation based on legal theory and legal principles. The findings reveal that, first, intellectual property legal norms are generally consistent in recognizing exclusive rights as the foundation of legal protection, although disparities remain in the regulation of enforcement mechanisms and sanctions across different statutes. Second, intellectual property protection norms have, in principle, satisfied the requirement of legal certainty through clear regulation of protected objects, legal subjects, and protection periods; however, further strengthening of normative consistency is still necessary. Harmonization of norms in accordance with the principles governing legislative formation is therefore essential to achieve equitable intellectual property protection
PRINSIP-PRINSIP HUKUM DAN BENTUK PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONTRAK DAGANG INTERNASIONAL Tata Eliestiana Dyah A; Jamaludin, Jamaludin
RETORIKA: Journal of Law, Social, and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Retorika: Journal of Law, Social, and Humanities
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69503/retorika.v3i1.1552

Abstract

Abstract International business contracts regulate the legal relations of parties across countries within different legal systems, potentially creating legal uncertainty if not carefully formulated. The existence of a choice of law clause is a crucial element in international trade contracts to ensure legal certainty, provide protection for the parties, and prevent future disputes. This study aims to analyze the legal principles underlying international trade contracts and examine the dispute resolution mechanisms used in international business contract practice. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collection of legal materials was carried out through literature studies, with legal material analysis using the legal interpretation method. The research findings show that the principles of international commercial contract law, including party autonomy, choice of law, and good faith, serve as the foundation for ensuring legal certainty and balancing the interests of parties across jurisdictions. Supporting principles such as lex loci contractus, real connection, and separability clauses ensure legal enforceability when the choice of law is unclear or the contract is disputed. In dispute resolution practice, litigation and ADR mechanisms are strategically applied, with arbitration occupying a primary role due to its final, binding, and easily enforceable cross-border nature, while mediation and other forms of ADR serve as cooperative mechanisms to maintain business relationships. The integration of these principles with dispute resolution mechanisms underscores the importance of legal norm harmonization and contractual efficiency in international commercial transactions.
Co-Authors Burhanudin JAMALUDIN Jamaludin .