Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of the Principle of the Rule of Law In the Criminal Process of Ukraine under Martial Law Khablo, Oksana; Nykonenko, Mykhailo; Zaika, Serhii; Galagan, Sergii; But, Yurii
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Summer Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v13i2.46340

Abstract

The scientific article focuses on the theoretical and applied problem of applying the rule-of-law principle in the criminal process in Ukraine under martial law. It is stated that in such critical conditions for Ukraine, most elements of the rule of law are negatively affected in the form of relevant restrictions, the necessity of which is of an objective nature due to the need to prevent global threats to the independence and territorial integrity of the state, repel armed aggression, ensure national security, as well as real and potential threats to human rights and freedoms. It is emphasized that to prevent violations of constitutional rights and human liberties, the problem of combating crime and protecting human rights under special legal regimes should be solved through such interrelated components as: legislative establishment of permissible restrictions on rights; creation of a mechanism for monitoring the adoption of measures that provide for limitations on rights; activities of institutions that ensure the protection and restoration of violated rights. It is concluded that in connection with the military events in Ukraine and numerous facts of committing illegal acts, it is essential to ensure not only the effective investigation of criminal offenses, the preservation of evidence, and ensuring the proper quality of investigative (search) actions, but also compliance with the rule of law and other principles of criminal justice. This requires a comprehensive approach: improving criminal procedural legislation, involving international organizations, and enhancing the skills of justice and law enforcement officials. It is emphasized that, under such conditions, international cooperation in criminal proceedings is of great importance to Ukraine and helps improve both the regulatory framework and practical experience. It is summarized that to unconditionally bring to justice those responsible for committing war and other crimes on the territory of Ukraine, criminal proceedings must be conducted in accordance with the general standards, requirements, and procedures of international judicial institutions, which will testify to the rule of law in the country, even in conditions of forced restriction of the rights and freedoms of citizens.
Administrative Crime and Policing Trends in Ukraine 2019–2024 Under Wartime Disruption Offenses Shvets, Yuliia; Korniienko, Maksym; Ivantsov, Volodymyr; Galagan, Sergii; Botnarenko, Oleksii; Ternytskyi, Serhii
Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Alumni dan Santri Mahyajatul Qurro'

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53754/htjdwq12

Abstract

   This study examines the behavior of policing-relevant administrative indicators in Ukraine across 2019–2024, spanning pre-escalation conditions and the period following the large-scale escalation of armed conflict beginning in February 2022. Using a measurement-aware, mixed-method descriptive design, we compile indicators across five domains: crime-processing backbone (registered and solved crimes), domestic-violence reporting, missing-persons caseload, institutional workload/service demand, and public trust in police. The evidence shows a clear discontinuity around 2022, where several domains stop behaving like extensions of pre-war patterns and begin reflecting a different measurement environment. Registered and solved crimes reverse direction after 2021 and expand through 2024, while the clearance proxy rises overall but does not move smoothly. Domestic-violence reports show volatility followed by post-2021 elevation, missing-persons magnitudes expand in post-2022 snapshots, and trust softens from 2023 to 2024. Cross-domain comparison reveals both convergence (multiple indicators shifting together around 2022) and divergence (clearance and trust moving differently from crime volumes). We interpret these patterns through an institutional-output lens: observed series are jointly shaped by changing reporting conditions, recording practices, coverage, and case processing constraints, not just by underlying prevalence. The study demonstrates a crisis-ready approach where indicators are reported faithfully to their public form, discontinuities are made explicit, and conclusions avoid over-claiming. Recommendations include pairing numbers with coverage/definitional metadata, treating cross-domain divergence as an audit trigger, and strengthening multi-source triangulation to distinguish changes in harm from changes in measurement.