Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Majority Science Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan
Flora, Heny Saida
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Impact of the Elimination of Defamation and Fake News Articles in the Criminal Code on Press Freedom and Government Accountability Flora, Heny Saida; Salmon, Harly Clifford Jonas
Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): JHK_OCTOBER
Publisher : PT. Hafasy Dwi Nawasena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61942/jhk.v2i6.456

Abstract

This research explores the impact of the elimination of defamation and fake news articles in the revised Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) on press freedom and government accountability. The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach to examine the perspectives of journalists, government officials, and civil society activists concerning how legal reform influences the dynamics between media and the state. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and non-participatory observation, then analyzed using Miles and Huberman's interactive model, consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that the removal of defamation and fake news articles has expanded press freedom and reduced the risk of criminalization against journalists in Indonesia. It signifies a progressive step toward strengthening democratic governance and legal protection of human rights, particularly the right to express and access information. However, the reform also presents new ethical challenges, as the absence of penal provisions may increase the spread of misinformation if not accompanied by strong media ethics and accountability mechanisms. In conclusion, the legal reform marks a significant transition from a restrictive legal culture to one that promotes freedom with responsibility. The study recommends the enhancement of journalistic ethics training, public media literacy, and stronger institutional collaboration between the Press Council, government, and civil society to sustain a balanced and accountable media ecosystem.
Digital Vigilantism and Cybersecurity: When the Public Takes Over Digital Law Enforcement Flora, Heny Saida; Arifah, Heni Inayatul
MSJ : Majority Science Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): MSJ - May
Publisher : PT. Hafasy Dwi Nawasena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61942/msj.v4i2.603

Abstract

The proliferation of digital technologies has engendered a distinctive socio-legal phenomenon wherein private citizens and non-state actors increasingly assume quasi-enforcement roles in the digital realm, a practice broadly characterized as digital vigilantism. This article examines the legal, ethical, and cybersecurity dimensions of digital vigilantism, with particular emphasis on its implications for the rule of law, due process guarantees, and the institutional integrity of state-based law enforcement. Employing a normative legal analysis combined with a systematic review of contemporary scholarly literature published between 2021 and 2025, this study identifies and critically appraises six principal forms of digital vigilantism—namely paedophile hunting, hacktivism, open-source intelligence (OSINT) investigations, social media shaming, cyber-fraud counter-operations, and organized digital patrols—across multiple jurisdictions including Indonesia, India, China, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. The findings reveal a persistent doctrinal tension between the perceived legitimacy of public digital enforcement and fundamental legal principles including presumption of innocence, the prohibition of arbitrary punishment, and privacy rights. This article argues that the absence of a coherent regulatory framework governing digital vigilantism constitutes a significant lacuna in contemporary cybersecurity governance, and proposes a multi-layered co-regulatory model that balances civic participation with institutional accountability. The study contributes to the nascent body of comparative digital law scholarship and offers actionable policy recommendations for legislators, law enforcement agencies, and civil society organizations.
Co-Authors Arifah, Heni Inayatul Salmon, Harly Clifford Jonas