Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparative Perspectives on Curriculum Development: The Societal and Natural Educational Theories of Ibn Khaldun and Jean-Jacques Rousseau Dariyanto, Dariyanto; Pratama, Dio Septa
Journal of Educational Research and Practice Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Educational Research and Practice
Publisher : Yayasan Centre for Studying and Milieu Development of Indonesia (CESMiD)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70376/jerp.v3i3.403

Abstract

This article examines the comparative perspective between Ibn Khaldun's social education theory and Jean-Jacques Rousseau's natural education theory, focusing on their implications for curriculum development. The background of this research stems from the fundamental differences in the thinking of these two figures, each offering a unique approach to the goals of education. Ibn Khaldun views education as a tool for maintaining social order and creating individuals who align with societal values. At the same time, Rousseau emphasizes individual freedom and the natural development of children within the educational process. This study aims to identify the similarities, differences, and relevance of both theories in the context of contemporary education. The methodology used in this research is a qualitative approach with a comparative analysis of the literature related to these two theories. The study finds that, despite their differing focuses, both contribute significantly to the development of a holistic curriculum that accommodates both societal needs and personal development of students. Ibn Khaldun emphasizes the importance of instilling social and religious values, whereas Rousseau emphasizes individual freedom and experiential learning. The theoretical contribution of this research lies in the integration of both approaches within educational thought, while its practical contribution is in its ability to provide insights to policymakers in designing a more balanced curriculum that is relevant to contemporary global challenges.
PENDEKATAN EKSPERIMENTAL DALAM MERUMUSKAN SINTESIS BARU: INTEGRASI PRINSIP DISTRIBUSI KEKAYAAN ISLAM DAN INOVASI BERORIENTASI MISI BAGI KETAHANAN GLOBAL Pratama, Dio Septa
Investama : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol 12 No 1 (2026): Investama : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis
Publisher : Investama : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56997/investama.v12i1.2938

Abstract

 Contemporary global challenges ranging from climate volatility and pandemics to widening social inequality have exposed the limitations of conventional economic paradigms in cultivating systemic resilience. This article argues that effective solutions require a transformative approach that integrates normative ethical frameworks, the dynamic role of the state, and rigorous empirical validation. Against this backdrop, the study introduces and examines an innovative analytical framework that brings together three distinct intellectual traditions: the ethical principles of wealth distribution in Islamic economics as articulated by M. Umer Chapra and M. Nejatullah Siddiqi; the Mission-Oriented Innovation (MOI) theory developed by Mariana Mazzucato to strategically steer innovation towards public purpose; and the experimental, evidence-based approach to policy design advanced by Esther Duflo. Through conceptual analysis and selected illustrative case studies, the article demonstrates how these three paradigms can be coherently integrated into a more comprehensive policy framework. The principles of Islamic economics provide a normative value foundation anchored in justice, equitable distribution, and collective welfare (maslahah) as the ultimate objective (telos). Meanwhile, the MOI framework articulates a strategic role for the state in shaping markets and directing investment in ways that are consistent with these normative goals. The experimental approach serves as a critical instrument for enabling iterative validation and contextual learning, thereby ensuring that the resulting policies are not only effective and efficient but also adaptive to evolving conditions. The findings indicate that the synergy among these three frameworks mitigates the limitations inherent in each approach when applied in isolation, while simultaneously offering a robust foundation for the development of holistic and evidence-based policies. The principal conclusion suggests that the application of an “experimental lens” in support of mission-oriented initiatives grounded in Islamic distributive ethics can significantly enhance both the quality of policy design and the overall impact of interventions aimed at building inclusive and sustainable global resilience. More broadly, this study contributes to the enrichment of interdisciplinary dialogue across the fields of development economics, Islamic economics, and policy innovation.